My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-02-22_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (43)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2008086
>
2008-02-22_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (43)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:23:08 PM
Creation date
3/11/2008 2:44:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2008086
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
2/22/2008
Doc Name
PDEIS Appendix C Subsidence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.2 Lithologic Factors Affecting Subsidence <br />Different lithologies (rock types) have differing strengths and therefore differing swell <br />potential when broken. As indicated on Table 4. Bank Density, Swell Factor and <br />Percent Free Swell for Selected Rocks and Soils, there is considerable variation in <br />the percent swell between rock types and within rock types. The height of caving above <br />the mine workings is reduced where the roof rocks consist of strong (high percent swell) <br />sandstones compared to weak (low percent swell) shales, mudstones or soft siltstones. <br />However, the height of rock fracturing above mined openings is greater for strong, brittle <br />sandstones compared to weak, more yieldable shales, mudstones and soft siltstones. <br />The mean percent swell of the overburden rocks controls the potential maximum height <br />of the collapse zone upward in the immediate roof above a longwall panel, an entry or an <br />intersection between an entry and a crosscut. Figure 10. Potential Collapse Heights <br />Above Different Mine Opening Geometries by Piggott and Eynon (1977) provides a <br />percent swell based method for predicting the maximum collapse height in the rock <br />above different mining geometries, i.e. rectangular collapse over large area panels, <br />wedge collapse over long narrow entries and conical collapse over four-way roadway <br />intersections. The calculation simply is for what height of roof rock must collapse and <br />expand to fill an underlying mined void applying three types of collapse geometry. Once <br />the void and chimney are filled with caved rock (gob), it is assumed that further roof <br />collapse will be prevented by the broken rock fill. <br />Gray, Bruhn and Turka (1977) tabulated data on 126 chimney collapses above room- <br />and-pillar workings in the nominally 6-foot thick Pittsburgh Seam to the overlying ground <br />surface. The relative cumulative frequency curve, Figure 11. Cumulative Percent of <br />Chimney Collapse Height, suggests that there is a very small probability, 0.8 percent, <br />that a collapse chimney of any type will progress upward through 200 feet of <br />Pennsylvanian formation coal overburden to the ground surface, irrespective either <br />mining geometry or collapse geometry. Gray et al. (1977) recorded the elapsed time <br />after mining that chimneys, sinkholes, breached the ground surface and pillar collapse <br />troughs dropped the ground surface, shown on Figure 12. Time Interval Between <br />Mining and Surface Breached or Dropped. They indicate that the time interval can be <br />as much as 100 years. The McClane Canyon Mine has extracted approximately 36% of <br />Cameo Seam coal by advance room-and-pillar mining at approximately 225 feet of <br />depth, apparently without any chimney collapse to the overlying ground surface. This <br />can be seen on Figure 6. McClane Canyon Mine Workings. This is common practice <br />for operating coal mines because the roof is reinforced as it is exposed and can be re- <br />supported as required during the operating life of the mine to prevent progressive <br />chimney collapse. After a mine is closed progressive deterioration of the roof can result <br />in chimney failures, which at shallow depths can and frequently do breach the ground <br />surface. Areas where the overburden thickness is less than 200 feet above the Cameo <br />Seam in the Proposed Coal Lease area should be considered at risk for long-term <br />chimney collapse to the surface. The 200-foot overburden contour is shown on Figure <br />13. Overburden and Outcrop Map for the Project Area. The 200-foot overburden <br />contour extends approximately 360 feet upstream from the outcrop line in Big Salt Wash <br />and approximately 550 feet upstream from the outcrop line in Garvey Canyon. Long- <br />term protection from chimney subsidence to the overlying ground surface can be <br />provided in such shallow overburden by partially backfilling the entries in these two <br />areas upon final closure of the Red Cliff Mine. <br />C-14 <br />DBMS 306 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.