My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-02-22_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (39)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2008086
>
2008-02-22_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (39)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:23:08 PM
Creation date
3/11/2008 12:37:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2008086
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
2/22/2008
Doc Name
PDEIS Chapter 4 Environmental Consequences and Mitigation
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTERFOUR Environmental Consequences and Mitigation <br />Some gas wells overlying the lease area may be plugged or "mined around." Mine Safety and <br />Health Administration (MSHA) Rules (30 CFR § 75.1700) require underground mines to <br />maintain a 300-foot diameter solid coal barrier around all active or inactive gas and oil wells, <br />unless a smaller barrier is approved by MSHA. Therefore, there will be no land use impacts to <br />oil and gas development and extraction. <br />The lease area is located on entirely on BLM-administered lands. Applicable land use plans <br />include the Grand Junction Resource Area RMP (BLM 1987) and North Fruita Desert <br />Management Plan (BLM 2004). The Grand Junction Resource Area RMP identifies <br />approximately 390,000 acres of the Book Cliffs as acceptable for further coal leasing <br />consideration (BLM 2004). The coal lease area is among the 390,000 acres identified in the RMP <br />as suitable for coal leasing. <br />The North Fruita Desert Management Plan states that recreation sites, where there is BLM <br />facility investment, will be protected from surface on-site oil and gas development. There will <br />be an NSO stipulation to 80 acres surrounding the trailhead and 200 acres surrounding the <br />campground, if the area is nominated for lease (BLM 2004). As currently proposed, these <br />facilities are not included in the proposed lease area, and there are no other BLM facilities in the <br />lease area that would be impacted. <br />Railroad <br />The proposed railroad spur would traverse approximately 9.5 miles ofBLM-administered land, <br />and approximately 5 miles of private land. Use of federal lands will require CAM to obtain <br />rights-of--way grants on these federal lands. <br />Existing land uses along the railroad route include dispersed and developed recreation, <br />agriculture, irrigated farmland, livestock grazing, wildlife use, transportation and utility <br />corridors, and low-density single family residential development within rural private land <br />parcels. Within the Town of Mack, the proposed route passes through areas zoned General <br />Industrial District (I-2). <br />A "wye" would be constructed to link the railroad spur with the main line at Mack to allow <br />uninterrupted train flow in all directions. <br />The railroad is located on BLM-administered lands and private lands within the jurisdiction of <br />Mesa County. The Grand Junction Resource Area RMP designated 234,113 acres as unsuitable <br />for public utilities, and 606,456 acres as sensitive to utility development; the remainder of the <br />Resource Area is designated suitable for consideration for public utilities (BLM 1987). The <br />railroad corridor is within the area designated suitable for consideration for public utilities. <br />The North Fruita Desert Management Plan identifies threatened and endangered species habitat, <br />scenic values, steep slopes, deer and elk winter range, and known locations of sensitive species <br />as sensitive to the location of public utilities (BLM 2004). The remainder of the North Fruita <br />Desert SRMA is designated suitable for utilities; the railroad corridor is within this area. <br />Private land in the project area is under the jurisdiction of Mesa County and is discussed in the <br />Mesa Countywide Land Use Plan (Mesa County 1996) and the Loma/Mack Area Plan (Mesa <br />County 2004). The railroad corridor is consistent with both plans. <br />4-3 <br />DBMS 558 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.