My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-03_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2008-03-03_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:23:53 PM
Creation date
3/4/2008 2:34:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
3/3/2008
Doc Name
Comment Letter
From
Joellen Turner
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 13 of 19 <br />pressure feed from the HDPE pipeline; it would be square and <br />that the Prime Farmland Topsoil would be intact there. Mr. Jim <br />Boyd from NRCS said that he already knew about the 50 share <br />limit and that he had run the design numbers himself and <br />thought the 50 shares ,for 50 acres, with two {2) siderolls was a <br />reasonable design and he could live with it. Mr. Mike Boulay <br />from the Division then stated that he had made notes from an <br />earlier telephone conversation with JoEllen Turner and she said <br />a share of water per acre is what the Morgans figure. The round <br />table of people said it sounded fine to them and they all agreed. <br />End of discussion. <br />Item 7: Production yield for first cutting of alfalfa was reviewed <br />1. The topic of Alfalfa yield for first cutting was discussed to see if <br />the standard for bond release could be changed. No one could. <br />come up with a better number than what is already the standard <br />in the Permit. So it was decided to leave the standard of: 1.84 <br />tons alfalfa for first cutting stand. It was noted that the written <br />testimony give by Mr. Morgan and Mr. Weimer back in 1998 <br />probably meant a field weight and not an ASTM laboratory air <br />dried weight. The permit will be changed to note that the weight <br />is a field weight. Everyone agreed to this and that was the endb <br />of the topic. <br />Item 8: Production yield for first cutting Irrigate Pasture was discussed <br />1. A brief discuss was make on the Irrigated Pasture (IP) reference <br />area and how it correlate to Bond Release. Everyone in the <br />room was familiar with the Reference Area by Lincoln Street, <br />how it was to be used, the correction factors Jim Boyd had <br />provided. All of this had previously been discussed when <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.