Laserfiche WebLink
Issues Raised by the Objecting Party <br />Issues raised by INFORM, the objecting party are represented by italicized bold print. DRMS <br />response to the objection issue follows in standard print. <br />References to the Act are from the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act, C.R.S. 34-32-101 et se~{c. <br />References to the Rules are for Minerals Rules and Regulations of the Colorado Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board for Hard Rock, Metal and Designated Mining Operations (2 CCR 407-1 ), <br />promulgated May 1977, and last amended October 1, 2006. <br />In these proceedings, DRMS jurisdiction is limited to enforcement of the specific requirements of the <br />Act and Rules. DRMS considered all timely submitted comments in its review of the application. <br />However, DRMS can only address the issues that directly relate to the specific requirements of an <br />application, as stated in the Act and Rules. <br />1. Page 1 and 2 of INFORM's objection cite DMO requirements of Rule 7 of the Hard <br />Rock Rules and Regulations and offers support for DMO designation of the Whirlwind <br />Mine. INFORM requests that the record leave no doubt the Whirlwind Mine be <br />regulated as a DMO. <br />Energy Fuels submitted the referenced application as a DMO based on preliminary <br />discussions with the DRMS under 34-32-112.5. The application includes an environmental <br />protection plan -designated mining operation per 34-32-116.5 and Rule 7. The application <br />was already classified as a DMO and DRMS staff reviewed the application based on all <br />pertinent Rules and Regulations not just DMO Rule 7. Based on the fact that the application <br />is submitted as a DMO, DRMS feels the record is clear as to its classification and regulation. <br />Any effort to change the DMO designation of the permit would be considered an amendment <br />which would require appropriate public notice and comment periods as prescribed in Rule <br />1.10. <br />2. INFORM addresses concerns regarding water quality, treatment and post mine <br />impacts (Pages 2 and 3). <br />Energy Fuels submitted an extensive hydrological review of the Lumsden Canyon and <br />Beaver Mesa basins to DRMS under Rule 3.1.6, 3.1.7 and 6.4.20(8). As noted water <br />pumped from the mine has elevated Antimony, Arsenic, Selenium and Uranium as well as <br />radionuclides Radium 226 and 228. Energy Fuels received a water discharge permit (#CO- <br />0047562)from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) under <br />the Colorado Water Quality Control Acton September 1, 2007. The treatment plant designs <br />for a Lyntek Modu-tank system were reviewed and approved by DRMS under separate action <br />on September 6, 2007. DRMS has jurisdiction for the construction of the plant while CDPHE <br />has jurisdiction over the actual discharge of any waters. Treatment of the waters is primarily <br />for radionuclides and selenium. However, other heavy metals are also precipitated as part of <br />the treatment process. The discharged waters must meet all applicable WQCA standards. <br />Energy Fuels is required to submit water samples monthly to CDPHE and will be forwarding <br />those results to DRMS for review as well. <br />Based on data submitted it appears that the amount of water treated will be greatly reduced <br />and possibly eliminated through mine use consumption. Water treatment is required for any <br />pumped discharge and will be done as needed through the life of the mine. <br />