My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-01-16_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2008086
>
2008-01-16_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:21:02 PM
Creation date
2/7/2008 3:18:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2008086
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
1/16/2008
Doc Name
Preliminary Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Subsidence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />The McClane Canyon Mine map, Figure 6. McClane Canyon Mine Workings, indicates room- <br />and-pillar advance mining, without pillar robbing on the retreat, to overburden depths just over <br />1,500 feet (generally 80 by 80-foot pillars on 100-foot centers for 36% recovery). Pillars were <br />robbed on the retreat from other panels at depths of very nearly 1,300 feet. Total coal extraction <br />(recovery) appears to have been as much as 78% within two small (roughly 520-foot maximum <br />width) irregular shaped panels that were retreat mined to depths of 1,100 feet. The mine map <br />indicates that robbing the 100 by 70-foot advance pillars using a method called "christmas <br />treeing" was incomplete and erratic, with many 100 by 70-foot advance pillars and occasional <br />100 by 30-foot stump pillars left within the panels. This method is no longer permitted by MSHA <br />because of safety concerns. In general, however, panel recovery was approximately 64% when <br />robbing pillars on the retreat, apparently leaving different shaped stump pillars when retreating <br />from different panels. The width of those panels ranged from 350 to 570 feet. <br />No observations have been reported of surface subsidence effects over the McClane Canyon <br />Mine. Estimates of maximum subsidence (Smex), tensile and compressive strains and maximum <br />slope changes were made over the five selected panels and are indicated by number on Figure <br />7. Subsidence Predicted for Five Selected Panels, McClane Canyon Mine. The method <br />used combined the British National Coal Board (NCB, 1975) method for longwall subsidence <br />prediction and the room-and-pillar adaptation by Abel and Lee (1984) presented on Figure 8. <br />Subsidence Over Room-And-Pillar Workings After Failure. Table 1. Predicted Maximum <br />Subsidence For Selected Panels, McClane Canyon Mine presents the estimated <br />super-critical subsidence over each of the selected room-and-pillar panels and the predicted <br />NCB corrected subsidence for the panel width with respect to depth. The predicted maximum <br />surface subsidence for the five panels ranged from 1.52 feet to 2.56 feet. Table 2. Predicted <br />Maximum Strains and Tilt for Selected Panels, McClane Canyon Mine presents the <br />maximum tensile and compressive strains and slope angle changes In addition, a rough <br />estimate of potential open surtace fracture widths was made for each selected panel. This <br />rough estimate was based on the relationship between the vertical subsidence measured over <br />York Canyon Mine longwall panels with known widths and overburden depths, measured <br />surface fracture widths and the NCB predicted maximum surface tensile strains for these known <br />conditions permitted an estimate of the potential width of surface tension fractures. <br />The magnitude of the maximum predicted surface extension strains presented in Table 2 would <br />develop roughly over the perimeters of the selected retreat mined panels, which ranged from <br />1780 µE to 2860 µE. Extension strains in the predicted range from approximately 1800 µE to <br />2900 µE on the surface would cause repairable damage, ranging from cracking of single story <br />brick walls to cracking of reinforced concrete frames. The predicted tensile strains would result <br />in estimated 1-inch to 2-inch wide tensile cracks at the ground surface. The predicted <br />magnitude of the maximum surface compressive strains ranged from 1940 µE to 3000µE, as <br />Page 8 of 57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.