My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-01-16_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2008086
>
2008-01-16_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:21:02 PM
Creation date
2/7/2008 3:18:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2008086
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
1/16/2008
Doc Name
Preliminary Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Subsidence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />height ranges from 10 to 11 feet. The 11-foot maximum planned mining height was used as a <br />conservative maximum thickness in the subsidence analysis. <br />3.2 Gateroad Pillar Configuration and Design <br />The currently planned gateroads will generally follow the example on Figure 2. Plan View of <br />Three Adjacent Longwall Panels, where the gateroad pillars involve one row of yield pillars <br />and one row of rigid pillars. The advantage of this design is that it should minimize stress levels <br />at the headgate and tailgate ends of the longwall face. The centerline distance between the <br />planned 20-foot wide gateroad entries will be 100 feet for the planned 80-foot wide rigid pillars. <br />The centerline distance between the 20-foot wide gateroad crosscuts will be 200 feet for the <br />180-foot long rigid pillars. The centerline distance between the gateroad entries adjacent the <br />30-foot wide yield pillars will be 50 feet and 100 feet between the crosscuts adjacent to the <br />80-foot long yield pillars. Every other crosscut for the yield pillars will line up with a rigid pillar <br />crosscut. <br />Figure 3. Estimated Gateroad Pillar Loads From Mining First Adjacent Panel indicates the <br />estimated minimum load and average stress that must be supported by the 30-foot wide by <br />80-foot long yield pillars, if the yield pillar is not to potentially crush. Figure 3 also indicates the <br />estimated rigid pillar load that must be supported by the planned 80-foot wide rigid pillars, after <br />the longwall face of the first adjacent panel has been advanced roughly one Load Transfer <br />Distance, approximately 329 feet, past any location. The Load Transfer Distance is how far from <br />active mining that deformation or loading in response is measurable or otherwise detectable, <br />and shown on Figure 4. Load Transfer Distance Data (compiled by Abel, 1988). <br />Figure 5. Estimated Gateroad Pillar Loads From Mining Second Adjacent Panel indicates <br />the estimated minimum load and average stress that must be supported by the planned 80-foot <br />wide by 180-foot long rigid pillars, if the rigid pillar is not to potentially crush, after the longwall <br />face of the second adjacent panel has been advanced roughly one Load Transfer Distance past <br />any gateroad location. It is not essential that the central gateroad entry remain open for <br />ventilation through the gob to the bleeder entries. Two of the active panel tailgate entries will be <br />open to the bleeder entries at all times during mining of the panel. See Figure 2. <br />The disadvantage of a line of rigid gateroad pillars through the gob is the potential for higher <br />horizontal tensile strain at the ground surface overlying the gateroad because the overburden <br />initially bends toward the first adjacent panel as it is mined and then in the opposite direction <br />when the second adjacent panel is mined, i.e. the tensile strains are additive over rigid <br />gateroads. The optimum situation is for the 80-foot wide rigid pillar to be only temporarily rigid <br />as the second longwall face passes. The rigid pillar can safely be allowed to yield and then <br />crush after it is roughly 100 feet out from the longwall face between collapsed gob on both <br />sides. This, in effect, reduces the tensile strain, and fracture opening, that is directly proportional <br />to the differential vertical subsidence between the gateroad and the maximum subsidence (Smax) <br />over the center of the adjacent panels. <br />3.3 Previous Mining <br />There is no known previous mining within the proposed coal lease. However, the McClave <br />Canyon Mine is operating in the immediately adjacent existing coal lease on most of Sections <br />15, 16, 21 and 22, T. 7 S., R. 102 W., 6 P.M. A small coal operation, the Munger Mine now <br />closed and reclaimed, operated in adjacent Section 27. Figure 1. Red Cliff Mine Project and <br />Coa/Lease Areas shows the location of these workings. <br />Page 7 of 57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.