My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-01-16_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2008086
>
2008-01-16_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:21:02 PM
Creation date
2/7/2008 3:18:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2008086
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
1/16/2008
Doc Name
Preliminary Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Subsidence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />The NCB method has been routinely used to estimate the maximum potential magnitude and <br />location of tensile and compressive strains and slope inclination changes that could be induced <br />at the ground surface by planned longwall mining. Being able to predict worst-case subsidence <br />effects has made it possible to take measures to mitigate damage to surface structures. Coal <br />has been routinely mined under cities, highways, pipelines, power lines, factories, railroads, <br />rivers, bridges, harbors, cathedrals, churches, schools, historic castles and keeps and other <br />sensitive structures. The method provides conservative estimates so that engineering <br />adjustments could be made to accommodate the conservatively predicted (worst case) <br />subsidence effects before they develop. The NCB method has been used to conservatively <br />estimate subsidence impacts in the Project Area. <br />The NCB method, which is a step-by-step procedure for predicting subsidence <br />effects from mining a longwall panel based on the fundamental factors of coal <br />extraction thickness, panel width between gateroad pillars and overburden depth. <br />Initially the method provides a graph for estimating the maximum vertical subsidence <br />reduction factor for the mining height based on Panel Width versus Panel Depth <br />(Figure 8. NCB Panel Width/Depth Maximum Subsidence (Smax) Prediction in <br />Affected Environment/Subsidence). Then the method provides a graphical plot of <br />various proportions of the maximum subsidence along a profile based on the Panel <br />Width/depth ratio from the center of a panel, across the side of the panel to the limit <br />of subsidence outside the panel (Figure 9. NCB Subsidence Profile Graph in <br />Affected Environment/Subsidence). The distance from the center of the panel is in <br />terms of the panel depth. The next graph provides multipliers for the ratio of the <br />maximum subsidence divided by the depth for a wide range of Panel Width/Depth <br />ratios. The values taken from the graphical plot for the particular Panel Width/Depth <br />ratio cross three lines, the "EXTENSION" line estimates the maximum tensile strain <br />(+E), the "COMPRESSION" line the maximum compressive strain (-E) and the <br />"SLOPE" line the maximum slope change or tilt (G), (Figure 11. NCB Maximum <br />Strain and Slope Prediction Graph in Affected Environment/Subsidence). The final <br />graph provides various proportions of the maximum tensile strain (+E) and maximum <br />compressive strain (-E) along a profiles from the center of a panel, across the side of <br />the panel to the limit of subsidence outside the panel (Figure 12. NCB Horizontal <br />Strain Profile Graph in Affected Environment/Subsidence). The method has been <br />modified by others to extend its application to room-and-pillar panel mining and to <br />consider the impact of varying proportions of sandstone, limestone and shale or <br />mudstone in the overburden. <br />The NCB subsidence method is used directly for longwall mines and has been <br />modified for room-and-pillar mines. Reported subsidence predicted and measured <br />over room-and-pillar workings at the Roadside Mine east of Palisade Colorado <br />predicted 1.61 feet, measured 1.02 feet in the Cameo Seam; the Eagle No. 5 Mine <br />southwest of Craig, Colorado reported having measured 10% more subsidence than <br />predicted and the Southland Mine near Canon City, Colorado predicted 1.51 feet, <br />measured 0.89 feet. The NCB method has been applied for subsidence prediction <br />over a longwall panel in the Mid Continent Mine west of Redstone, Colorado <br />predicted 4.99 feet and measured 1.71 feet ;the York Canyon Mine west of Raton, <br />New Mexico predicted 8.1 feet and measured 7.09 feet. Subsidence was predicted <br />using a modified NCB method at the Chimney Rock coal augering mine east of <br />Pagosa Springs, Colorado predicted 2.59 feet, measured 0.49 feet. <br />6.1 Subsidence Zones <br />Page 24 of 57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.