Laserfiche WebLink
~O <br /> <br />LJ DEVELOPMENT, INC. <br />256 N. MERRILL DRIVE <br />PUEBLO WEST, CO 81007 <br />PHONE:719-240-9424 FAX:719-583-0768 <br />Date: January 19, 2008 <br />DEB ZACK <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />1313 Sherman Street, RM 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />RE: `SECOND ADEQUACY REVIEW <br />FOR M ~7-069 PHEASANT RUN GRAVEL PIT <br />Dear Ms. Zack: <br /> <br />/~ ~ . <br />~. ~ ~, ~. <br />~. ,r <br />.; • > <br />'J..,v`, <br />This letter will give you the additional items and inforniation you have requested in order <br />to complete the 112c application for M-2007-069 PHEASANT RUN GRAVEL PIT. I <br />will answer all your questions in the order presented in your adequacy review letter dated <br />January 10.2008. The Mining Plan has been revised in order to acquiesce to the Rocky <br />Ford High Line Canal Company. The Rocky Ford High Line Canal Company and the <br />applicant have been negotiating items that the Canal Company would like to see changed <br />as a result. the operator/applicant. has agreed to the following. The change would reduce <br />the phases from four (4) down to three {3}and that mining would start on the south side <br />of the canal. Both parties also agreed that mining would not start on the north side until <br />the ditch company agreed to the structural stability report done by Kleinfelder, Inc. a geo- <br />technical engineering company. Then after reviewing the stability report Rocky Ford <br />High Line Canal Company and the applicant would then set the no mining buffer zone <br />adjacent to the ditch. Another item that was revised is that under the bridge in lieu of two <br />{2} feet free board four (4} feet would work better for the ditch company this was agreed <br />to by the applicant. The bridge will be installed over the Canal with permission from the <br />Rocky Ford High Line Canal Company. The ditch company will grant an easement and <br />approve the placement of the bridge at the start of mining the south side of the ditch. The <br />Reclamation Plan Map has also been revised to reflect. the changes mentioned above. I <br />will start the answers in the order you presented the questions) concerns: <br />Rule 6.4.6 Exhibit F- Reclamation Plan Mau <br />1. The Reclamation Pian Map has been revised to help clarify the elevations in question. <br />The maps should now replicate the contours lines clearly and make it clear and <br />understandable. The applicant will answer any questions if the drawing is still unclear. <br />