My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-08-17_PERMIT FILE - C1981035 (38)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2007-08-17_PERMIT FILE - C1981035 (38)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:17:41 PM
Creation date
12/6/2007 11:20:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
8/17/2007
Doc Name
Cultural and Historic Resource Survey
Section_Exhibit Name
KI Appendix 03
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• INTRODUCTION <br />A Class III cultural resource inventory of approximately 200 acres (80.8 ha) was carried out <br />for National King Coal on two parcels overlying proposed underground coal mining operations <br />in the Hay Gulch area, southwest of Hesperus, La Plata County, Colorado. Both are privately <br />owned by Lawrence Huntington and are part of the Huntington Ranch, with federal subsurface <br />minerals. The survey was carried out on July 10 and 11, 1997 by Laurens C. and Nancy S. <br />Hammack of Complete Archaeological Service Associates (CASA). <br />This project area overlies a portion of a coal seam currently being mined by National King <br />Coal from their mine in the northwest corner of Section 32. All mining beneath the survey <br />parcels will be at a depth of 300 feet in underground workings and will not involve any <br />disturbance to the surface. The only possible effect to the surface may be minor subsidence, <br />which is monitored on a monthly basis by the Office of Surface Mining. <br />This project was carried out at the request of the Office of Surface Mining in compliance <br />with applicable historic preservation legislation and laws. The field work, on private lands, <br />was undertaken under the provisions of BLM CRUP No. C-39285, issued to CASA. <br />EFFECTIVE ENVIRONMENT <br />The project area is located in a series of southwest trending mesas and ridges interspersed <br />with deep intermittent drainages to the La Plata River Valley. Elevation ranges from 7260 ft In <br />Pine Gulch to 7620 ft on the mesa top. Soils are shallow silts over sandstone bedrock. Pinyon- <br />juniper woodland with scrub oak, sagebrush and various shrubs and perennials is the major <br />• vegetation community. The current and paleoenvironment of the general area has been <br />summarized in detail in Chenault (1996). <br />Parcel A includes the southeast slope of a flat mesa top, portions of Pine Gulch, and a <br />narrow north-facing strip of the opposite ridge (Figure 3). The mesa top has been chained and <br />burned in the past and is presently used for sparse grazing. A faint track road extends down the <br />mesa. Parcel B Includes the head of Barnes Canyon, and the mesa south to the drop-off into <br />Pine Gulch. This area is pristine pinyon juniper woodland which is currently used for grazing. <br />CULTURAL HISTORY AND PREVIOUS RESEARCH <br />Background data on the cultural history and previous research of the general area has <br />been recently summarized in Chenault (1996). Volume 1 of this series summarizes the Class 2 <br />inventory of the Mancos and La Plata river basins for the proposed Animas-La Plata irrigated <br />lands project. One of the sample units, D-l, was approximately 3 miles south of the current <br />project area. No cultural resources were located within this quarter section. <br />Previous research in the specific project area has been limited to an inventory of 60 acres <br />less than one-half mile north of the present survey parcels. This area, on Ute Mountain Ute <br />lands, was also surveyed for expansion of National King Coal mines and no cultural resources <br />were located. <br />Based on previous inventories, few cultural resources were expected in the survey areas. <br />Due to the elevation and distance from water, sites were expected to be limited to historic <br />homesteads or prehistoric hunting losses or temporary hunting camps. Evaluation of <br />prehistoric sites was based on Eddy, Kane and Nickens' (1984) regional research design, while <br />historic themes presented by Husband (1984) and Buckles and Buckles (1984) were used to <br />assess historic resources. <br />2 <br />.~..__.~ <br />July 1997 <br />--- - - - ~. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.