My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-08-17_PERMIT FILE - C1981035 (21)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2007-08-17_PERMIT FILE - C1981035 (21)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:17:40 PM
Creation date
12/6/2007 11:10:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
8/17/2007
Doc Name
Environmental Assessments
Section_Exhibit Name
KI Appendix 13
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In addition to the people actually employed at the mine, <br />• various coal hauling contractors employ an additional <br />equivalent of 18 full-time jobs. Since there are no railroads <br />serving the area, trucking is the only method of transporting <br />coal to markets in New Mexico, Arizona and Colorado. <br />In 1995, the King Coal Mine paid approximately $1,855,000.00 <br />in salaries to its employees. The King Coal Mine pays <br />substantial amounts in federal, state, and local taxes. In <br />1995, the company paid approximately $173,000.00 in workmen's <br />compensation, $295,000.00 in federal royalties, $24,400.00 in <br />reclamation taxes, $75,000.00 in excise tax for black lung <br />benefits, $29,000.00 in state severance taxes, and $30,000.00 <br />in county property taxes. <br />IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS <br />A. Alternative 1 - Proposed Action <br />1. Critical Elements <br />a. AIR QUALITY <br />No direct, indirect or cumulative impacts have <br />been identified. <br /> <br />b. AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (ACEC) <br />The area is not- located within an area <br />designated as an ACEC by the San Juan/San <br />Miguel Resource Management Plan. <br />c. CULTURAL RESOURCES <br />Direct Impacts- Since there is no anticipated <br />surface disturbance on the proposed <br />modification area, no cultural inventories <br />were performed. There are no direct, indirect <br />or cumulative impacts to cultural resources <br />identified. <br />Indirect Impacts- Due to the low height of <br />room and pillar mining, and the depth of <br />overburden, there is a low likelihood that <br />subsidence will cause surface disturbance. <br />Cumulative Impacts- <br />identified. <br />None have been <br />,. • 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.