My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-11-14_REVISION - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2007-11-14_REVISION - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:18:24 PM
Creation date
12/3/2007 3:18:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/14/2007
Doc Name
Record of Decision for MCC's E Seam Methane Drainage Wells Project
From
USFS
To
Interested Party
Type & Sequence
TR111
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I have also considered Executive Order 13212, which directs federal agencies to take steps to increase the <br />energy supply to our nation, and the Energy Policy Act of 2005. <br />This decision will result in about 2.3 miles of temporary road construction in the West Elk IRA. I <br />understand that many interested parties are concerned about any development in (IRA). Road construction <br />activities in IRAs are currently managed under the direction of the 2001 RACR, as reinstated by the 9`h <br />District Court for the Northern District of California (FEIS, pp. 7-8). The temporary road construction <br />activities in the IRA approved in this decision are consistent with the 2001 RACR, as approving this <br />construction is allowable under Exception 7 to the 2001 RACR (roads needed for the continuation, <br />extension, renewal of a mineral lease on lands that were under lease as of January 12, 2001) since the <br />leases involved were issued prior to 2001 (C-1362 dates to 1967 and COC-56447 dates to 1995, see FEIS, <br />pp.5-6)`. ,Consistent with requirements of the RACR, all temporary roads constructed in the IRA for the <br />purposes of this project will be reclaimed by full obliteration including recontouring and. revegetation <br />when no longer needed to access MDWs. Further, the roads will only be open during project use to the <br />proponent and for administrative purposes (i.e., no public access). See Appendix C of this document or <br />Table 2-1, Design Criteria in the FEIS for information on Roads and Roads in Inventoried Roadless Area, <br />and other resources to see measures that will be taken to minimize effects in the IRA. <br />In addition, this area (as described in Chapter 3 of the FEIS, Inventoried Roadless Areas) has been <br />effected by both road construction and other uses. The portion of the West Elk IRA where the project area <br />is located has seen the construction of approximately 30 miles of road since 1979 and was not deemed <br />suitable for inclusion in the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1980, nor was it considered suitable in the 2005 <br />Roadless Inventory and Evaluation of Potential Wilderness Areas (GMUG;. 2005) due to compromised <br />quality and management of roadless character. <br />Although the Forest Service responsibility within the federal coal program relates to use of the surface <br />lands, I acknowledge that implementation of this decision could result in the release of about 7 million <br />cubic feet per day of methane. Further, I understand other federal agencies and private interests are <br />concerned about release of methane from the mine into the atmosphere, and I share the goal of having the <br />gas resources under lease to facilitate mitigating2 the release of methane by some mechanism should it be <br />feasible. Up to this point, mitigating released methane has not been possible because the gas resources <br />(which are federally managed) are not under lease, and therefore implementing any mitigation could not <br />occur (FEIS, pp. 44 to 46, .Chapter 5 and responses to EPA letter in project file). To this end, I committed <br />that the GMUG would complete the needed work to forward consent to BLM leasing the gas lease parcels <br />that are coincident with the Federal coal leases in the project area. However, due to the presence of IRA <br />in the project area, not all of the lands nominated for gas lease could be brought forward for lease as such <br />would be inconsistent with the RACR as reinstated by the 9`h District Court for the Northern District of <br />California. As of the date of this ROD, the GMUG had forwarded all lands nominated for gas lease in the <br />project area outside of the IRA to the Rocky Mountain Regional Office per standard procedure. By <br />completing this work, the first critical step to affording potential methane release mitigation is underway. <br />On a related note, interested parties also expressed the desire to condition the gas leases so to be <br />complimentary with on-going coal operations. The BLM Colorado State office and Forest Service are <br />currently reviewing this issue. It is anticipated that these particular gas lease nominations would not be <br />ready for gas lease sale until 2008. <br />' No road construction in the IRA portions of Federal Coal Lease COC-67232 (effective March 1, 2007) <br />is included in this decision. <br />2 Methods of mitigating methane release to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and current understanding of <br />feasibility of them are dicussed in the FELS Chapter 2 and 5, and in the GMUG response to an EPA letter <br />in the project file. <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.