My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP51868
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP51868
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:56:33 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 1:11:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981034
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
6/17/1985
Doc Name
1984 AHR LETTER & REPORT
From
GRAND MESA COAL CO
To
MLRD
Annual Report Year
1984
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
mass average conductivity and flow relationships between SP - A <br />• and B and SP - C than found in the 1983 report. The lower flow in ~ <br />SP - A may indicate a change in irrigation pattern o.r may reflect <br />the lower flow of Ward Creek. In either case the higher conductivity <br />is typical of lower flow. The flow from SP ~ is primarily the mine <br />discharge. The flow and conductivity both creased during the year <br />reflecti~§'the amount of discharge from UG - 5. This; year the flow <br />from SP ~ nd UG - 6 were closer than last year. Seepage and <br />evaporat on ay account for part of the difference. The 9" Parshall <br />flume removed from Williams Creek was installed for ;;P - C, result- <br />ing in better flow measurements. The lower conductivity in SP - D <br />corresponded to the lower conductivity of Ward Creek. The calculated <br />mass average affect the T.D.S. of SP - A and SP - B on SP - D was <br />6.7 and 21.8 mg/L increases respectively. <br />Sampling on the springs was reduced to flow measurements during <br />the irrigation season. Flow in Springs 1, 3 and 4 are taken by <br />timing a five gallon bucket. Better collection methods were imple- <br />• mented during the year for more accurate flow measurements. Monitor- <br />ing the flow on Spring #2 is not even attempted due the high dilu- <br />tion from irrigation runoff and Williams Creek overflow. <br />The Nelson Ditch has been monitored monthly since 6/84. This <br />ditch contains runoff water from Carbon Ditch SP - D and SP - C <br />irrigation as well as several springs south of the mine site. This <br />ditch is being monitored on a trial basis to determine whether SP - B <br />discharges have any detectable effect at that point. <br />Ground Water <br />Table G-84 represents average water levels and field quality <br />for the ground water piezometers and wells. <br />The water in the coal seam wells was higher in 1984 than 1983. <br />The greater gains were seen in D - 3 and E - 3. The recent succes- <br />• sion of wet years may have gradually increased the head on these <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.