Laserfiche WebLink
PAGE TWO <br />MARCH 7, 1995 <br />BARBARA PAVLIK <br />6) This text is meant to be only a general description of the data. Please refer to the actual <br />data in Appendix C and the hydrographs in Appendix D for details. <br />7) The leak was insignificant at the time and soon after the longwall passed by and the location <br />became inaccessible, therefore the hole was not plugged. <br />8) In future AHRs the high and low values will be included in Table 2-4. During the 1993-1994 <br />water year, discharge point 026 saw a TDS high of 5058 mg/L and a low of 4240 mg/L. <br />9) WFU has checked into this matter and there is no new information as of this time. We <br />sincerely doubt that any information will be forthcoming from EPA. <br />Enclosed with this letter are a revised Table 2-1 (page four of the 1994 AHR) and a revised <br />Attachment A from Appendix A. Please replace page four with the new page and replace <br />Attachment A with the revised Attachment A. <br />If you have any questions about the above responses, please call me or Steve Powell. <br />Sincerely, <br />;~1~.r.~~ ~ti~ <br />Murari P. Shrestha, P.E. <br />Assistant Manager of Engineering <br />MS:Igp <br />ce: Jeff Dubbert <br />Tim Chervick <br />Mike Salmond <br />