Laserfiche WebLink
Lorencito Fill Report Review <br />May 29, 2002 <br />Page ] 3 of 14 Pages <br />Rule 4.09.1(11)(b) The qualified registered engineer shall provide to the <br /> Division a certified re ort <br /> Within 2 weeks after each ins ection Yes <br /> that the fill has been constructed as specified in the design Yes <br /> a roved b the Division. <br /> The report shall include a description of any appearances Yes by <br /> of instability, structural weakness, and other hazardous exceptionb <br /> conditions observed Burin the ins ection. <br /> <br />Rule 4.09.1(1 1)(c) Any certified report addressing the underdrain system and Completed <br /> protective filters shall include color photographs taken earlier <br /> during and after construction, but before underdrains are <br /> covered with excess spoil. The color photographs <br /> accompanying each certified report shall be taken in <br /> adequate size and number with enough terrain or other <br /> physical features of the site shown to provide a relative <br /> scale to the photographs and to specifically and clearly <br /> identif the site. <br /> <br />Rule 4.09.1(13) If the disposal area contains springs, natural or manmade Applicable <br /> watercourses, orwet-weather seeps, an underdrain system earlier. <br /> consisting of durable non-acid-forming and <br /> non-toxic-forming rock shall be constructed from the wet <br /> areas in a manner that prevents infiltration of the water <br /> into the spoil material. The underdrain system shall be <br /> protected by an adequate filter and shall be designed and <br /> constructed using standard geotechnicalengineering <br /> methods. <br /> <br />' By signature titles, Ronald G. Thompson was the inspector. The certification statement does not <br />say that Thompson was under the direct supervision of McGlothlin. There is a PE stamp on the <br />report. <br />z The first Fill Area #7 report was undated but received at the Division on January 25, 2002. The <br />inspection may have occurred during January, 2002. This would be the second quarterly report. <br />a The report would have been more complete if information on terrace configurations had been <br />included. You make this point in your draft. <br />6 By omission, one might infer compliance. However, better engineering practice would be to <br />include a statement that none exists. <br />Summary: Recommend the addition to your draft comments (Disposal of Excess Spil] Fill Area <br />