Laserfiche WebLink
Lorencito Fill Report Review <br />May 29, 2002 <br />Page 11 of 14 Pages <br /> (see <br /> subscri t 3 <br /> The report shall include a description of any appearances Yes by <br /> of instability, structural weakness, and other hazardous exceptionb <br /> conditions observed durin the ins ection. <br /> <br />Rule 4.09.1(11}(c} Any certified report addressing the underdrain system and Completed <br /> protective filters shall include color photographs taken earlier <br /> during and after construction, but before underdrains are <br /> covered with excess spoil. The color photographs <br /> accompanying each certified report shall be taken in <br /> adequate size and number with enough terrain or other <br /> physical features of the site shown to provide a relative <br /> scale to the photographs and to specifically and cleazly <br /> identif the site. <br /> <br />Rule 4.09.1(13) If the disposal area contains springs, natural or marunade Yes. The <br /> watercourses, or wet-weather seeps, an underdrain system report states <br /> consisting of durable non-acid-forming and that there <br /> non-toxic-forming rock shall be constructed from the wet was no <br /> areas in a manner that prevents infiltration of the water evidence of <br /> into the spoi] material. The underdrain system shall be springs or <br /> protected by an adequate filter and shall be designed and seeps. <br /> constructed using standard geotechnical engineering <br /> methods. <br /> <br />~ By signature titles, Ronald G. Thompson was the inspector. The certification statement does not <br />say that Thompson was under the direct supervision of McGlothlin. There is a PE stamp on the <br />report. <br />z Fill Area #8 reports were submitted dated January 25, 2002 and this one of Mazch 3Q 2002. <br />Both dates would be within the First Quarter 2002. Your draft asks for the date of the inspection. <br />The report indicates that fills have not come within 50 feet of final face. <br />s You have a request for the date of the inspection in your draft. The report was received at the <br />Division on April 22, 2002. It may have been sent to the Division within the two-week <br />requirement. <br />6 By omission, one might infer compliance. However, better engineering practice would be to <br />include a statement that none exists. <br />Summary: In your draft, you make the statement that no photographs of the drain aze included. <br />There would be none if this was all covered up at the time of the inspection. You may want to <br />