My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP50217
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP50217
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:55:17 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:46:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
8/25/2005
Doc Name
2004 Annual Hydrology Report
From
HydroGeo Inc
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
2004
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
West Elk Mine 2004 Annual Hydrology Report 40 <br />erosion and sediment deposition the control channels used to calibrate the pressure transducers and <br />gauge the stream flows are constantly changing and the flow data collected for Deep Creek in WY <br />2002 (HydroGeo, 2003), WY 2003 (HydroGeo, 2004), and WY 2004 is not considered reliable. <br />The data and graphs presented in this report were developed using a rating curve developed from <br />recent channel geometries but the raw data for these stations remains suspect. The Upper Dry Fork <br />stream station was submerged by a beaver pond in WY 2002 and remained inoperable in WY 2004. <br />The Upper Dry Fork Flume will be reestablished in the summer of 2005. )n addition, the Lower <br />Dry Fork and Upper Minnesota Creek flumes will be cleaned out and modified to improve flow <br />through. <br />Since the well casings have collapsed in monitoring wells SOM-45-H1 (Sept. 2002), SOM-2-H <br />(Jul. 1999), SOM-16-H (Sep. 2000), 96-27-1 (Apr. 2002), and SO.W-1 (Jun. 2002) over the past <br />few years, the water quality and water level data collected is not considered to be 100% reliable. <br />These wells are dysfunctional so future monitoring data collection at these locations will not <br />provide useful data. <br />7.0 SUMMARY <br />During WY 2004, the Project was in regulatory compliance with all hydrologic aspects. Mining <br />operations did not cause any significant impacts to local surface or ground water resources. The <br />drought conditions during the past few years abated in WY 2003 and WY 2004 and flows to <br />surface streams were near normal. Spring flows have improved, but remain below normal. The <br />water levels in most of the ground water monitoring wells have remained relatively constant over <br />time. However, monitoring wells that aze above-or down-gradient of active longwall mining often <br />times show lower water levels. Since mining commenced in the Box Canyon Panel area water <br />levels in monitoring wells 01-11-1 and RAV 4b, both located down-gradient of active mining have <br />dropped, and are likely the result of dewatering of the B-Seam. Water levels in wells typically <br />recover to pre-mining levels several months to several years after longwall mining in the area <br />ceases. The casings of wells SOM-2H and SOM-16H have collapsed, most likely due to mine- <br />induced subsidence, but these effects have been limited. <br />As MCC's mining operations shifr from the west side of the Project area to the south and east side, <br />the Project's hydrologic monitoring program must be revised accordingly. A hydrologic <br />monitoring system must be established in areas of future mining s, so that adequate and reliable <br />baseline data can be collected. Table 12 summarizes the recommended revisions to the existing <br />• <br />August 2005 HydroGeo, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.