Laserfiche WebLink
GROUND WATER HYDROLOGY <br />Piezometer depths and locations were chosen to obtain an appreciation of natural ground water <br />conditions in a variety of water-bearing units to evaluate the degree of connection between the abandoned <br />and Oooded underground mine workings and to permit a sampling of representative ground waters for <br />chemical analysis. Most installations were located along the western mining limit, thereby allowing long term <br />monitoring of the ground water Bow system and the effects of the proposed mining activities. <br />Methods <br />A total of 46 sealed piezometers were installed at 22 sites throughout the permit area in order to <br />monitor and evaluate ground water Bow and chemistry. Depths and locations of all piezometers are <br />summarized in Table 1 and shown on Figure 1. Each Piezometer consists o[ a one-inch ID PVC pipe <br />installed in 4 3/4 inch diameter drillhole. The lowest 10 feet of the PVC pipe was slotted and a cap placed <br />on the bottom. A warse sand pack oC approximately 10 to 15 feet in length was placed around the <br />Piezometer tip and a seal of bentonite pellets placed on top of the pack. Between one and three individual <br />piezometers were installed in each drillhole depending upon the depth and stability oC the hole. The hole <br />was backBlled with cuttings and grout to the surface and a 6 inch steel casing was installed at the surface <br />over the PVC pipes for protection. Between one and three holes were drilled for each Piezometer nest. <br />Piezometers installed in old underground mine workings could not be sand packed, but were sealed above <br />the workings with a mud basket and bentonite pellets. <br />During visits to each station, water level measurements were made using aSoil-Test Indicating <br />Depth Meter with a conductance bridge. Levels were recorded from the top of the well casing and reported <br />as such. <br />Water quality samples were collected during the biannual field trips. Samples were obtained with a hand <br />bailer, grabbing at least three casings of water prior to sample collection. Measurements for temperature, <br />pH and conductivity were made in the field utilizing an Orion Research Mode1399A portable pH meter and <br />Hach Model 16300 portable conductivity meter. All other parameters were collected in precharged bottles <br />and submitted to Chemlech Laboratory in Salt Lake Cily for analyses. Methods of analysis were consistent <br />with EPA standard testing procedures. <br />Results <br />Results of the monitoring period are contained in Appendix 1 (water levels) and Appendix 2 (water <br />quality). <br />The permit area is located on the eastern rim of the Raton Basin. General movement of water in the <br />permit area is eastward. Because of geologic conditions, the permit area has been divided into three <br />hydrogeologic sectors as shown on Flgure 1. These hydrogeologic sectors are divided by major geologic <br />features which influence the local movement of ground water. Sector 1 is bounded by a dike along the <br />southern property boundary and Maitland Arroyo on the north. Sector ll is bounded by Maitland Arroyo <br />on the south and a fault on the north. Sector III is bounded by a fault on the south and Gordon Arroyo <br />on the north and contains the disturbed area associated with the existing pit. These dikes and faults act as <br />low permeability barriers and tend to align the direction of ground water Bow in each of the sectors to the <br />eastern boundary of the permit area. The monitoring wells located within each sector are listed below. Those <br />marked with an asterick (•) were monitored monthly during the first six months of the year and those <br />marked with two astericks (••) were monitored quarterly for the second six months of the year. <br />