My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP49885
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP49885
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:54:00 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:41:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/28/2005
Doc Name
2004 Annual Hydrology Report & Reclamation Report
From
Coors Energy Company
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
2004
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and June 2004 provided adequate moisture for cool season species to germinate and grow, <br />• while below normal precipitation in the late autumn of 2003 and summer of 2004 hampered <br />overall warm season species growth and development. <br />2.2.2 Vegetation Cover <br />Vegetation cover was estimated by the use of the point-intercept method. An ocular point <br />frame (ESCO Associates) was used to minimize instrument error and maximize precision <br />and observer accuracy. Cover ttansects were 25 meters in length, with two sample data <br />points collected at 1.0 meter intervals along the transect on opposite sides of the transect <br />centerline, 1.Sm apart. Trsect direction was established randomly through the use of <br />computer generated random directions (0-360°). In no event were transects allowed to <br />extend within ten feet of reference or revegetated azea boundaries to minimize impacts from <br />"edge effect." <br />For statistical purposes, each cover transect (comprising 50 data points) served as a sample <br />unit. Data points recorded the first vertical "hit" on vegetation (above or below the <br />instrument), soil (bare ground), rock, litter, or cryptogamic crust. Subsequent "hits" on <br />vegetation were also recorded. Cover data were recorded and reported by individual plant <br />species. The first interception was used to calculate total vegetation cover values. Additional <br />interceptions were used to calculate relative cover of individual plant species and lifeforms. <br />The quantitative cover data also provided the basis for calculation of species composition and <br />relative importance. <br />• 2.2.3 Herbaceous Production <br />Herbaceous production was estimated by the harvest method. One herbaceous production <br />plot was located and randomly oriented at the origin of each cover transect. Additional <br />production plots were randomly located. Herbaceous production plots were 0.50 square <br />meters in area. All current year above ground live herbaceous plant biomass was clipped <br />within the 0.50 square meter quadrat. Perennial grasses, annual grasses, and annual, biennial, <br />and perennial forbs were separated and reported by lifeform. Succulents, suffrutescent, and <br />woody plants were not sampled. Production material was air dried until weights varied by no <br />more than O.lg. <br />2.2.4 Species Composition <br />Species composition information was derived from quantitative vegetation cover data. <br />Relative cover information provided a basis for evaluation of the importance of each <br />encountered plant species and lifeform and for comparison to the Srial revegetarion success <br />criterion. The tables presenting data summaries for total vegetation weer for each azea <br />sampled also contain the relative cover by species, and a wlumn depicting the numerical <br />ranking of each species by relative cover within the azea. <br />L J <br />Coors Energy Company Page 4 <br />2004 RevegetaUon Monitoring Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.