My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP49885
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP49885
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:54:00 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:41:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/28/2005
Doc Name
2004 Annual Hydrology Report & Reclamation Report
From
Coors Energy Company
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
2004
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Location Cover Herb. Prod. <br /># of sam les # of sam les <br />1998 Reseed/Interseedin s <br />Area 2 2.0 ac.) 1 2 <br />Area 7 (1.6 acJ 1 2 <br />Area 10 9.7 acJ 6 9 <br />Area 15 (2.7 ac.) 2 2 <br />Total Sam les Reseed/fnterseedin 10 15 <br /> <br />1999 Reclamation Areas <br />Area 5 (2.6 ac J 2 2 <br />Area 9 15.3 ac.) 8 13 <br />Total Sam les 1999 Areas 10 15 <br />Sample sites were located in the field through wmpass triangulation and pacing from known <br />landmarks. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the location of the reference and reclaimed azeas and <br />sample point locations for each area sampled. <br />In the areas reclaimed in 1985, 1986, 1987, 2000, 2002, and 2003 a qualitative evaluation of <br />revegetation success was undertaken this year. The 1985, 1986, and 1987 areas were <br />previously monitored (1994-1998) and after successfully meeting revegetation success <br />criteria, were released from the Phase lI liability requirements by the Colorado Division of <br />Minerals and Geology August 11, 1998. This year, qualitative evaluation of these azeas <br />included estimating vegetative cover, herbaceous production, and identifying the dominant <br />plant species. Any locations or trends in vegetation development that required attention were <br />• also noted. The areas revegetated in 2000 (Areas 6 and 19) and 2002 (Area 25) were <br />qualitatively evaluated this year. Area 29 was seeded in the autumn of 2003 was briefly <br />evaluated. <br />The Osgood sand reference area was measured and mapped in the field in 1994 by Savage and <br />Savage staff, and this scaled drawing of the reference azea was used. On the scaled drawing, a <br />Cartesian coordinate grid (50x50 feet) was established. Computer generated random numbers <br />were used to establish a pool of x,y coordinates. Ten vegetation cover and fifteen herbaceous <br />production sample locations were randomly established for the reference area. Sample sites <br />were located in the field through compass triangulation and pacing from known landmazks. <br />• <br />2.2 FIELD SAMPLING <br />2.2.1 Timing <br />Field investigation was undertaken during the period August 5 through August 11, 2004. <br />This time period coincided with anthesis and maximum development of the majority of plant <br />species found in both the native vegetation community (Osgood sand reference azea) and the <br />reclaimed azeas at the mine site to be evaluated. Precipitation at the mine was significantly <br />below average during the period from October 2003 to July 2004, revealing a 40.5 percent <br />deviation below the mean for this time period. Average precipitation amounts between April <br />Goore Energy Company Page 3 <br />2A04 RevegeWtion Monitoring Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.