My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP47956
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP47956
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:51:45 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:11:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984062
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
11/2/1994
Doc Name
1993 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT REVIEW RESPONSES MINE 3 C-84-062
From
CYPRUS YAMPA VALLEY COAL CORP
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
1993
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />C c~~us <br />"`~ Yampa Valley <br />I~~ I~I II I~I <br />Cyprus Yampa Valley Coal Corporation <br />29587 Routt County Road M27 <br />Oak Creek, Colorado 80467 <br />303879-3800 <br />October 31, 1994 <br />RECEI~FD <br />Mr. Kent Gorham N~~ ~ ~ tgg4 <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Office of Mined Land Reclamation <br />Division of Minerals and Geology DivisionotMinera~~..~euiogy <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />RE: 1993 Annual Hydroloav Report Review Responses. Mine 3, <br />~'C-84-062 <br />Dear Mr. Gorham: <br />We have reviewed your letter of June 15, 1994 and are providing the <br />following responses. <br />1. The division requested in a letter dated March 24, 1993 that <br />CYCC add the elevation of well 008-SP-4b to Map 4b. This was not <br />done as requested, Additionally, the permit boundary is not shown <br />on Map 4b as required by Rule 2.10.1(3). Please add these two <br />items and re-submit Map 4b. <br />Response: The requested items have been added to Map 4b and two <br />copies of the revised map are attached. <br />2. The x-axis on the figures does not seem to correlate in any <br />organized way with the x-axis ticks or data. Please explain this <br />apparent discrepancy. <br />Response: The tick marks on the x-axis were automatically inserted <br />by Lotus when the charts were generated to add reference marks <br />between the date ticks. They will be eliminated from future <br />charts. <br />3. CYCC requested and recieved approval to submit annual survey <br />data for Site 304 within the AHR rather than in June of each year. <br />Why was this data not submitted? <br />Response: The April 1993 survey data for Site 304 was included on <br />Table 1 of the AHR. This table has been updated to show the June <br />1993 survey of Site 304. There was no change in elevation from <br />April to June. <br />4. Flow data is missing for Site 24 during April. Please correct <br />and re-submit two copies of the appropriate pages. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.