My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP47025
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP47025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:50:28 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 11:39:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Name
HISTORIC RECORD STUDY AREA BASELINE CHARACTERIZATION 1996 PRECIPITATION SOILS VEGETATION WEST ELK MI
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
grasses, annual grasses, and annual, biennial, and perennial forts were clipped and <br />bagged to represent total herbaceous production. Succulents, suffrutescent, and woody <br />plants were not sampled. Production material was air dried until weights varied by no <br />more than O. lg. Results are reported as grams per square meter. <br />Woodv Plant Density <br />Woody plants do not form a significant component of the study area vegetation. <br />Sampling woody plant density through the use of parametric sampling techniques would <br />be inappropriate given the paucity of woody plants. In order to quantify and describe <br />the woody plant component within the study area, a complete census of the woody <br />plants present within the study area vegetation community was undertaken. The census <br />counted all woody plants within the study area by species. Woody plants within six <br />feet of the obvious edge of the study area were not counted. <br />Species Composition <br />Species composition information was derived from vegetation cover data. Relative <br />cover information provided a basis for evaluation of the importance of each <br />encountered plant species and lifeform. <br />Sample Numbers/Sample Adequacy <br />Sample adequacy was calculated for vegetation cover and herbaceous production. For <br />the purposes of this sampling, vegetation cover and herbaceous production sampling <br />was undertaken to sample adequacy. A minimum of fifteen samples per parameter <br />were taken. Parameters were tested at the 90% confidence level. Calculated minimum _ <br />sample number and standard deviation are reported as an indication of variability of the <br />sampled parameters. Comparisons between sample mean parameter values assume that <br />the sample mean value accurately represents the population mean in all cases. The <br />following formula was used for sample adequacy calculations: <br />(t)z (s)'` <br />nmin = -------------- <br />(d Xbar)2 <br />where: nmin =minimum sample size <br />t =the Student's t distribution value at the 90% confidence level <br />s =sample standard deviation (s)2= sample variance <br />d =percent acceptable deviation from the mean (10%) <br />Xbar =sample mean <br />-11- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.