My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP47025
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP47025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:50:28 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 11:39:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Name
HISTORIC RECORD STUDY AREA BASELINE CHARACTERIZATION 1996 PRECIPITATION SOILS VEGETATION WEST ELK MI
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
recommendations of CDMG, each composite soil horizon sample was analyzed for pH, <br />electrical conductivity, percent organic matter, texture (percent sand, silt, clay), <br />estimated lime, nitrate nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, sodium adsorption ratio <br />(SAR), calcium, magnesium, sodium, zinc, iron, manganese, copper, selenium, <br />molybdenum, and boron. Analysis results are presented in Table 3 for each horizon. <br />Analyses were made using standard extraction techniques for soil analysis. Nitrate <br />nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, zinc, iron, manganese, and copper were analyzed <br />through an ammonium bicarbonate-DTPA extract. Selenium and molybdenum were <br />analyzed through use of a hot water extract technique. Boron was evaluated using a <br />saturated paste technique. <br />Vegetation Sampling <br />Four vegetation parameters were sampled to evaluate the vegetative condition of the <br />study area. Vegetation cover, total herbaceous production, species composition, and <br />woody plant density were the parameters for which quantitative data were collected for <br />the historic record vegetation community. <br />Vegetation Cover <br />Vegetation cover was estimated by the use of the point-intercept method. An ocular <br />point frame (ESCO Associates) was used to minimize instrument error and maximize <br />precision and observer accuracy. Cover transects were 25 meters in length, with two <br />sample data points collected at 1.0 meter intervals along the transect on opposite sides <br />of the transect centerline, I.Sm apart. Transect direction was established randomly. In <br />no event were transects allowed to extend within ten feet of the study area boundary or - <br />disturbed areas (e.g., two track road, stock pond) to minimize impacts from "edge <br />effect." <br />For statistical purposes, each cover transact (comprising 50 data points) served as a <br />sample unit. Data points recorded the fast vertical "hit" on vegetation (above or below <br />the instrument), bare ground, rock, or litter. Subsequent "hits" on vegetation were also <br />recorded. Cover data were recorded and reported by individual plant species. The first <br />interception was used to calculate total cover values. Additional interceptions were <br />used to calculate relative cover of individual plant species and IifeforTns. The <br />quantitative cover data also provided the basis for calculation of species composition. <br />Herbaceous Production <br />Herbaceous production was estimated by the harvest method. One herbaceous <br />production plot was located and randomly oriented at the end of each cover transact. <br />Additional herbaceous quadrats were located randomly as described above. Herbaceous <br />production plots were 0.50 square meters in area. All current year above ground live <br />herbaceous plant biomass was clipped within the 0.50 square meter quadrat. Perennial <br />-io- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.