My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP46748
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP46748
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:50:04 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 11:17:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
1995 AHR & ARR RECLAMATION REPORT
Annual Report Year
1995
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• MASS BALANCE <br />CEC disposed of 38,576 tons of mixed fly and bottom ash, from the Coors <br />Brewing Company/Trigen Colorado Energy Corporation (see Ash Disposal <br />Data) facility, in the South end of "B" Pit using approximately 14,000 BCY <br />of overburden material to cover the disposal area, and to control dust and <br />fugitive debris in the immediate area. Again, relatively small amounts of <br />overburden were excavated from the Long Term Spoil area. Approximately <br />50,000 BCY of topsand was moved to complete work begun in 1994 on final <br />reclamation of the tipple area, evaporation pond and road areas, and a re- <br />work area, in order that these areas could accommodate seeding activity. <br />"B" PIT VOID AREA ......................................1,305,600 <br />"A" PIT VOID AREA ...................................... 157.800 <br />EXCESS SPOIL REMAINING ON SITE........ 816,100 <br />* The comparative differences in "overburden" versus "ash disposed" <br />amounts between 1994 and 1995 can be explained as follows: <br />(1) overburden material is used to both create the ash disposal cell and <br />cover the ash once deposited, (2) 1994 saw the creation of a number of <br />small cells as alignment of the cells in "B" pit was established, and <br />(3) in 1995 only two new cells were created thus significantly lowering <br />the amount of overburden required. <br />** Variation in the "A" pit void area (1994 to 1995 reports) results from the <br />use of the 1986 reclamation plan to compute the 1994 void space, <br />whereas the 1995 calculation relies on the currently-suggested plans for <br />final post-mining contour and drainage configurations. <br />Transitioning to CAD System <br />The 1994 AHR Report addressed CEC's concerns relative to comparison of <br />contouring between the 1993 and 1994 mapping activities. Since the <br />reliability of the map work is key to most other activities relative to <br />reclamation, it is important to build confidence in this data. Since this is only <br />the second year the CAD system has been used for this mapping, a further <br />review of the contour discrepancies (year to year) was conducted. This <br />review affirmed and reinforced statements made in the 1994 AHR Report, <br />that the discrepancies then noted were the result of earlier techniques and <br />carried forward errors, problems which should be eliminated through the <br />AHR-1995 -112- STIPiTLATION #17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.