My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP46272
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP46272
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:49:22 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 10:52:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
6/17/1998
Doc Name
1997 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT PART 1 OF 2 INTRODUCTION TABLES & NPDES LETTERS
Annual Report Year
1997
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Bowie Resources Limited <br />Bowie No. 1 Mine <br />1997 Annual Hydrology Report <br />• <br />• <br />Introduction <br />Bowie Resources Limited acquired the Orchard Valley Mine from the Cyprus Orchard Valley <br />Coal Corporation in December 1994. The underground coal mine, renamed the Bowie No. 1 <br />Mine and consisting of the joined East and West mines, is located approximately two miles <br />north of Paonia, Colorado. This mine is currently idled due to economic considerations. The <br />Bowie No. 1 East Mine has not operated since it was sealed in June 1986, following a mine <br />fire. The azeal extent of the East Mine workings was 1,156 acres at that time. During July <br />1993, rehabilitation efforts at the portal azea of the East mine were completed and the mine <br />workings of the East and West mines were connected. Oniy the first fifteen crosscuts of the <br />East mine were reopened. The rest of the mine remains sealed and inactive. The existing coal <br />processing support facilities at the East mine were reactivated during 1993. The support facility <br />at the West mine remains and, during periods of operation, is used for supplies and Gght <br />maintenance activity. Coal is transported from the West mine through the East portals. The <br />West mine was opened in January 1987. The azeal extent of the West mine at the end of 1997 <br />was approximately 764 acres. The combined acreage ofthe East and West mines is <br />approximately 1,800 acres. The coal mined from both the East and West mine is in the "D" <br />seam of the Mesaverde Coal Member, with proposed mining concentrated in three azeas of thick <br />coal or "pods" refereed to as the East, Central and Westem thick coal pods. Access to the East <br />pod was cut off by the 1986 mine fire, but new projections may offer a new access through a <br />....more cuout'loos rouCe-T997=mimngwri-}imbed to the Western thick coal pod and the thinner <br />seams located between the Central and Westem thick coal pods. <br />Hydrologic monitoring began at the mine in 1983. This report presents monitoring results from <br />the 1997 monitoring season. Discussion is presented by each monitoring category identified in <br />Table 1 - Summary of Hydrologic Monitoring Stations -Required Monitoring for Annual <br />Hydrology Report. Table 1 immediately follows this narrative and precedes the 1997 data <br />summaries provided for each station. Maps depicting the locations of aU Hydrologic <br />monitoring stations are appended to this report. Water quality monitoring includes field <br />pazameters (Table 2 -Field Parameters), water quality parameters (Table 3 -Lab Parameters), <br />and NPDES parameters (Table 4 - NPDES Pazameters). <br />Ponds were sampled for water quality when discharging or outflows were occurring. Ponds in <br />the permit azea aze typically spring-fed or seep-fed and exlu'bit diffuse non-concentrated azeas of <br />inflow. Often, the pond outlets present the only point of concentrated flow at which flow <br />measurements and field pazameters can be obtained. Where possible, quality measurements aze <br />obtained at the pond inlet. Stagnant water in ponds was not sampled since water quality resuhs <br />would show the effects of evaporation and stock use and therefore are not used to evaluate the <br />potential mine impacts. <br />Pege 1 of7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.