Laserfiche WebLink
J. J. Dudash 2 March 5, 2004 <br />4. Monitoring point table 73, for Deer Trail ditch-lower, shows a Jlow of 72 gpm <br />on 6/24/02. However, there is no full suite analysis from list 1, as required on <br />permit application page 2.05-76. Please explain. <br />BRL -Lab analysis results from 6/24/02 for Deer Trail ditch-lower were <br />inadvertently overlooked in the 2002 AHR reports. Lab results for C-Gulch-low, <br />Hub-low, Hub-up, Deer-up, NFG-low and NFG-up from 6/24/02 also were not <br />reported. Enclosed are corrected Monitoring Tables for these points. <br />5. There are quite a few full suite analyses done in the fourth quarter of 2002 that <br />appear to be incomplete. The surface water and ground wafer sites include Deer <br />Trail Ditch-upper, Hubbard Creek-lower and upper, North Fork of the <br />Gunnison-lower and upper and Terror Creek-lower and upper. The ground <br />water sites are DH-1 S, DH-2S, DH-39, DH-49, DH-SSa, AW-1, AW-2, AW-3, <br />AW-4, AW-S, AW-6, AW-7 and AW-9. The chemical that are not in the <br />analyses include carbonate, hydroxide, nitrite, nitrogen, phosphate, <br />phosphorous, cadmium, lead, iron (dissolved), manganese and zinc. Please <br />explain. <br />BRL -All of the aforementioned monitoring sites were fully analyzed during the <br />fourth quarter of 2002. The chemicals left blank on the 2002 reports, with the <br />exception of hydroxide and phosphorus, should have shown "<MDL". Hydroxide <br />and phosphorus aze not analyzed pazameters for these sites. Enclosed are corrected <br />2002 Monitoring Tables. <br />6. It is stated on monitoring point table 91 for drill hole DH-38 that the bailer <br />became lodged in the /role. Is this hole recoverable so full suite analyses can be <br />run? <br />BRL - We were able to get the bailer dislodged from the hole, however, the hole is <br />still too constricted to use the bailer. Depth to water will continue to be monitored. <br />7. On monitoring point table 94, it is stated that a foreign object in the hole <br />prevented sampling of monitoring drill hole DH-58. Is DH-58 still a viable <br />sampling point? <br />BRL -Foreign object was dislodged and monitoring was successful in 2003. <br />8. The list of drill hole water monitoring locations in Table 1 of the 2002 AHR <br />does not contain all of the monitoring sites listed on page 2.05-76 of the permit <br />application. The missing sites include DH-16, DH-34C, DH-57, DH-57a and <br />DH-67D. According to the text on page 5 of the 2002 AHR, DH-57 and DH-57a <br />were mined through in 2001. Are there substitutes for these two wells? These <br />two sites should be taken off of the monitoring site list on permit application <br />