Laserfiche WebLink
2002 AHR Review <br />February 3, 2004 <br />Page 2 of 2 Pages <br />r <br /> Above the Mine See throu h the Dam Below the Mine <br />2003 521 to 650 832 to 1067 521 to 900 <br />2002 490 to 750 869 to 1079 510 to 733 <br />2001 506 to 681 861 to 970 508 to 813 <br />200 505 to 666 835 to 1025 513 to 1005 <br />Baseline 500 to 700 900 to 1400 600 to 730 <br />PAP, Table 8, page 57 <br />Harvey Gap Field pH Values <br /> Above the Mine See throu h the Dam Below the Mine <br />2003 6.0-7.6 6.5-7.6 6.0-7.6 <br />2002 6.5-7.5 6.5-7.5 6.5-7.5 <br />2001 6.5-7.5 6.5-7.5 6.5-7.5 <br />200 <br />Baseline 6.0 - 7.8 6.0 - 7.65 6.4 - 6.4 <br />' PAP, Table 8, page 57 <br />No explanation has been developed for the higher conductivity values at the downstream (Harvey <br />Gap Outlet -Below Mine) sampling site. The seep from under the dam has greater influence (raises <br />readings) on downstream measurements during low flows. There is no report of any groundwater <br />seeps or surface flows to the Harvey Gap drainage from the mine workings. <br />Values are variable and low. There is no visual indication of effluents from the mine or the vicinity <br />of the mine. There was a short period of time over which base line values were obtained. There is an <br />impact of the seep (not related to mining activities) on downstream values of conductivity. The <br />Division concurs with the hydrologic impact assessment of no impact. <br />C-1984-064, AHR 03 <br />C:\bgw\ W P DOCS\Eastside\ahrrvw03.doc <br />CC: Dan Hernandez (e-mail) <br />