REP45978

• Permit No: C1984063
• IBM Index Class Name: Report
• Doc Date: 2/3/2004
• Doc Name: 2003 AHR Compliance Review Memo
• From: BGW
• To: File
• Annual Report Year: 2003
• Permit Index Doc Type: Hydrology Report
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman St., Room 215
Denver, Colorado 80203
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
interoffice
MEMORANDUM
to: File C-&4-063 Eastside Mine
from: Byron G. Walker ~/
cc: Dan Hernandez (e-mail)
subject: Review for Compliance, 2003 Annual Hydrology Report
date: February 3, 2004
COLORADO
DIVISION OF
MIN &RALS
GEOLOGY
0.ECLAMATION•M ININL
SAFETY•EQENCE
Bill Owens
Governor
Greg E. Walther
Executive DIEPCIOr
Ronald W. Cattany
Division Director
Natural Resource Trustee
Rule 4.05.13(4)(c): A hydrologic report shall be submitted to the Division annually with the date
of submittal determined in consultation with the permittee. The annual hydrologic report shall
contain at a minimum:
The report is in compliance with this rule. The submittal date is "by the end of the following
February" (PAP page 59). The report, dated January 2004, was received in the Division of Minerals
and Geology (Division) on January 31, 2004 under a Stephen Self letter of January 27, 2004.
Rule 4.05.13(4)(c)(i): Water quantity data obtained from each monitoring site during the water
year;
Water quantity data was submitted by calendar yeaz in-lieu-of water yeaz. The requirement is
calendaz yeaz (PAP page 59). The sedimentation pond has been removed (Report Page 2).
Rule 4.05.13(4)(c)(ii): Water quality data obtainedfrom each monitoring site during the water year;
and
The report is in compliance with this rule with the exception that water quality data was submitted by
calendaz year in-lieu-of water year (PAP page 59).
Rule 4.05.13(4)(c)(iii): If required by the Division, a written interpretation of the data and
identifrcation of mining related impacts to the hydrologic balance.
The report is in compliance with this rule. The Division required no written interpretation of the data,
but a summary of impacts is provided in the report. There were no measurable impacts (Report Page
3). The probable hydraulic consequences are presented in the Permit. The prediction was that there
would be no water quality impact (Permit, page 63).
Harvey Gap Field Conductivity Values
Office of Office of Colorado
Mined Land Reclamation ARive and Inactive Mines Geological Survey