My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP44072
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP44072
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:46:25 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 10:07:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
8/31/1993
Doc Name
POWDERHORN COAL CO ROADSIDE REFUSE DISPOSAL AREA FIELD TRIAL EVALUATION OF TEST PLOT VEGETATION AND
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Herbaceous Production <br />' Total herbaceous production on this treatment plot was 46.74 g/m2 (415.99 lb/ac). <br /> Bromus japonicus/tectorum dominated the herbaceous production at 13.76 g/m2 or <br /> 29.4% of total production. The dominant perennial grasses Hilaria jamesii and <br /> Sporobolus airoides accounted for 10.28 g/m2 and 5.86 g/m2 of total production, and <br />' total perennial grass production was 16.24 g/m2 . Ten annual forbs produced 16.74 <br />g/m2 for 35.8% of the herbaceous production. Herbaceous production results for this <br /> treatment are found in Table 10. <br />' Woody Plant Density and Dimensions <br />j There were 171 woody plants counted on this plot for a density of 2483/acre. Three <br /> species were present with Chrysothamnus nauseosus dominating. The largest woody <br /> plant on this plot was an Atriplex canescens individual measuring 174 cm high by 383 <br />' cm in diameter. This was the largest woody plant encountered on all the test plots. <br /> Woody Plant information is presented in Tables 29 and 30. <br />' Species Diversity <br /> There were five plant lifeforms present in this treatment plot. They included three <br />' perennial grasses, one annual grass, three annual forbs, two woody plants, and one <br /> cryptogam. Of these, two perennial grasses, one annual grass, three annual forbs, and <br />' two woody plants represented species with greater than three percent relative cover. <br /> 3.3 Test Plot 2 <br />3.3.1 Test Plot 2: 6" <br />' Cover <br />' Total vegetation cover for this treatment was 31.6%. Graminoids accounted for 26.8% <br />mean cover, forbs 3.2% mean cover, and woody plants 1.6% mean cover. Litter <br />' accounted for 16.0% total cover and bare ground 51.6%. Cover results for this <br />treatment are listed in Table 11. <br />' Bromus japonicus/tectorum at 23.6% mean cover (75.0% relative cover) was the <br />predominant grass. The subdominant species was Agropyron cristatum with 1.6% <br />mean cover (5.0% relative cover). Additional graminoids included Sporobolus airoides <br />with 0.8% mean cover (2.5% relative cover), and Agropyron smithii and FJymus <br />junceus (Russian Wildrye), each with 0.4% mean cover and 1.2% relative cover. <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.