My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP43512
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP43512
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:45:44 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 9:55:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/28/1986
Doc Name
SENECA II 1985 ANNUAL HYDROLOGIC REPORT FN C-80-005
From
MLRD
To
PEABODY COAL CO
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Richartl D. Lamm <br />Governor <br />iii iiiiiiiiiiiii iii <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />Davitl H. Getchas, Eaecutiva Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION <br />DAVIDC. SNEtTON, Director <br />July 28, 1986 <br />Mr. Jim Lunan <br />Peabody Coal Company <br />1300 South Yale <br />Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 <br />• <br />DIVISIO N <br />Re: Seneca II 1985 Annual Hydrologic Report (File C-80-005) <br />Dear Mr. Lunan: <br />The Division has recently concluded its review of the Peabody Coal Company <br />responses to the Division's April 24, 1986 review of the 1985 Seneca II Annual <br />Hydrologic Report. The Division has identified several concerns which are <br />addressed in this correspondence. To facilitate review, the items below are <br />presented in the same format as the June 25, 1986 submittal. <br />1. (A) Peabody states that groundwater may flow from one side of the <br />anticlinal axis to the other at the Seneca II mine site. Peabody <br />should clarify this statement, and expand upon this theory given the <br />following two conditions: (1) the flow lines on Exhibit 7-2, which are <br />derived from the potentiometric surfaces similarly mapped on Exhibit <br />7-2, indicate that the general direction of flow varies from <br />sub-parallel to almost normal to the axis of the Tow Creek Anticline; <br />(2) areas adjacent to the anticline (north and west of the axis in the <br />central portion of the mine area) are identified as, and presumably <br />remain, unsaturated (see Exhibit 7-2). <br />(B) The Division is concerned with the loss of head in well GW-545-P1 <br />and requests that Peabody more thoroughly address the loss of head due <br />to recharge area disturbance in the Wolf Creek mining area. <br />Specifically, Peabody should address the loss of head in GW-S45-P1, a <br />Wolf Creek Coal completion, given the relative stability of the water <br />level in GW-545, a Wolf Creek Overburden/Wadge Underburden completion. <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.