My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP43417
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP43417
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:45:36 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 9:54:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Name
1997 Annual Hydrology Report & Mine Inflows Study
Annual Report Year
1997
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 1997 Annual Hydrologic Report <br />Page 7 <br />r~ <br />L_J <br />I~ <br />Mine Water <br />The annual mine inflows study for this Year was taken the end of September 1997. <br />This study is being made a part of the AHR. The results of the study are given on data <br />pages MA-16 thru -18 and MB-12. A summary of past conductivity and flows from the <br />monitoring locations are given on Tables M97-1 thru 5. Inflow monitoring locations are <br />shown on the 1997 Mine Inflows Map. <br />As usual, there are many differences in the monitoring results at the Roadside South <br />Portal. These differences are primarily the result of changes in mining locations; <br />differences in water routing, piping and pumping patterns; and general difficulties <br />involved with monitoring underground. The big change this Year was the large <br />increase in flow at the south mains sump location 5. <br />Monitoring at locations 24, 25, and 27 thru 31 was discontinued in 1996 due to sealing <br />of the south end of the No. 2 South Mains. Flow from these locations is piped from <br />these seals and is now monitored as new location 34. Flows from sealed panels at <br />locations 26, 15 and 6 dried up as well as location 16. The reduction inflow from these <br />sites may have corresponded to increased inflows in the 6th East Panel. This panel <br />was completed and sealed in June of 1996 and inflows into the panel were not <br />accessible. The "total inflows" in the last column of Table M97-3 shows increasing <br />inflows for the Year Conductivity at location 23 was higher than the corresponding <br />sources from previous studies probably because the flow was only a trickle. This is <br />typical of water setting in a sealed area prior to discharge. The mass average pH and <br />conductivity for the inflows was 8.3 and 1382 umhos/cm respectively. Using the <br />average pH, conductivity and discharge for 001 and 002, the mass average pH and <br />conductivity discharged during the Year was calculated to be 7.5 and 2064 umhos/cm. <br />Table M97-3 was prepared to estimate the total inflows and discharges from the <br />Roadside South Portal but does not include the water consumed for mining purposes <br />as discussed in the Consumptive Use section of this report. For the inflow calculation, <br />an attempt was made to account for water level changes in the old portions of the mine. <br />Negative values of "water level" flow represent periods when the water level was <br />decreasing as a result of discharge being greater than the inflow. The calculated <br />inflows for September were 237.3 gpm which is slightly less than the 258.1 gpm <br />measured. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.