Laserfiche WebLink
There was no significant difference between plant values in plots <br />with and without phosphorous for 1986 ana 1987. <br />For both 198ti and 1987, the application of either Brominal or Glean <br />resulted in significantly more plants than no application of <br />herbicide (P equals 0.01). <br />For 1986, the application of Glean resulted in significantly more <br />plants than did the application of Brominal (P equals 0.051, and the <br />early application of Glean resulted in significantly more plants than <br />did the late application of Glean (P equals 0.05). By 1987, however, <br />there was no significant difference between Brominal and Glean (P <br />greater than 0.10), and there was no significant difference between <br />the early and late application of Glean (P greater than U.10). <br />Either herbicide was effective in significantly improving plant <br />establishment, while the time of application was not critical if <br />current labeling is followed. <br />The percent of weeds was not significantly different (P greater than <br />0.10) between 1986 and 1987 far the seed mixtures or for imprinting <br />and nonimprinting. Also, there were no significant differences (P <br />greater than 0.10) in the plots with and without mulch in 1986 and <br />the plots with or without phosphorous in 1986. However, in 1987 <br />there was a significantly (P equals 0.05) higher percentage of weeds <br />in the plots with mulch than those without mulch, and in 1987 the <br />percent of weed was significantly (P equals 0.10) higher in plots <br />with phosphorous than those without. <br />For both 1986 and 1987, the application of either Brominal or Glean <br />resulted in significantly fewer weeds than no application of <br />herbicide (P equals 0.01). <br />In 1986 and 1987, there was no significant difference between <br />Brominal and Glean (P greater than 0.10) in the percentage of weeds, <br />and there was no significant difference between the early and late <br />application of Glean (P greater than 0.10). Both herbicides were <br />effective in controlling these weeds. <br />Seed mixture B was the mosf. cost effective seed mixture used on this <br />site. The most cost effective treatments for seed mixture B were <br />late Glean, Brominal, and early Glean. Table 8 provides the cost <br />effectiveness for all treatment combinations for each seed mixture. <br />When treatment combinations involve a herbicide application, the cost <br />effectiveness of imprinting, phosphorous, and mulch are significantly <br />reduced due to the presence of the relatively low cost herbicides. <br />RE COIIFIENDATIONS FOR TEST PLOT DESIGN <br />When developing seed mixtures, keep them simple and utilize species that are <br />easily differentiated. <br />Questionable adapted species should be planted only in single species <br />evaluation rows. <br />