My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP43039
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP43039
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:45:05 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 9:46:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1992069
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/22/1993
Doc Name
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
From
TUTTEL APPLEGATE INC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Soil properties used for this analysis are as follows: <br />Description Design Parameter <br />Top layer - Silty Sands <br />Soil~Classification SM <br />Plasticity Index 5 <br />Liquid Limit 20 <br />Plastic Limit 15 <br />Cohesion 0 <br />Internal Angle of Friction 15deg (40~ <br />Layer 2 - Sandy Gravels <br />Soil Classification GM <br />Plasticity Index 7 <br />Liquid Limit 29 <br />Plastic Limit 22 <br />Cohesion 0 <br />Internal Angle of Friction 35deg oi~ <br />Layer 3 - Sandstone Bedrock <br />Solid impermeable Layer <br />Design Analysi <br />The embankment was analyzed using the UTEXA52 Slope Stability <br />program developed by the Army Corp of Engineers and the University <br />of Texas, Department of Civil Engineering. This program performs <br />the analysis of an earth embankment with custom input parameters to <br />model the critical parameters and conditions that may occur during <br />a given condition such as this one. The analysis performed is <br />based on the conditions listed above. <br />l~lethodology Used in Analysis <br />The computer analysis that was run used the Spencer's procedure <br />(].967). The first run performed a circular shear failure search to <br />find the shear plane with the lowest factor of safety. Because of <br />the stable nature of the embankment only minor failures on the <br />surface of the side slope resulted in this analysis. To check <br />these results another procedure - Simplified Bishop's procedure <br />(1.955) - was used with different X-Y coordinates. The convergence <br />of'.these two procedures supported the stable embankment assumption. <br />TYie second approach was to manually search for the center <br />coordinates and radius with the lowest factor of safety. This <br />method entailed forcing a failure in the area most likely to have <br />a major failure then moving the center coordinates slightly and <br />comparing the factors of safety (FOS). This procedure was repeated <br />until the lowest FOS was determined. The results are shown in the <br />appendix. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.