My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP42793
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP42793
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:44:46 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 9:43:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
11/30/1995
Doc Name
1994 ANNUAL RECLAMATION AND HYDROLOGY REPORT HAYDEN GULCH MINE PN C-80-003 HAYDEN GULCH TERMINAL
From
DMG
To
TERRAMATRIX
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />alluvial well in Hayden Gulch, to treat that water for domestic <br />use. Exhibit AA in Exhibit Volume II and Table 19 in Section <br />2.04.7 show that there are no alluvial wells located in the <br />alluvium of Hayden Gulch. However, the date of the exhibit is <br />1980 and, as I recall, there are several homes located in Hayden <br />Gulch. <br />Please provide an updated Exhibit AA and Table 1§ in order to <br />determine if there are any homeowners in Hayden Gulch.u¢ing the <br />Hayden Gulch alluvium for domestic water use. If such use is in <br />progress, please discuss whether the degradation in surface <br />water in Hayden Gulch could materially damage the alluvium. <br />SECTION 3.0- SPRING AND SEEP MONITORING <br />4. As you had informed me earlier, please change the > sign to the <br />< sign for the 1994 Sediment Volumes table on page 4. <br />EXHIBIT 1- HAYDEN GULCH UPPER AND LOWER SITES <br />5. For the surface water chemical analyses, please provide <br />annotation that describes the type of analysis done, such as <br />total recoverable or dissolved. <br />6. Please provide the rationale for submitting only the results of <br />ground water and surface water analyses for 1987 and later. <br />7. Please provide annotation that distinguishes between field <br />conductivity and lab conductivity. <br />8. Several parameters that are required to be tested do not appear <br />in the report. Table 1 in Section 2.05.6 of the permit <br />application ,lists dissolved oxygen (field), turbidity (field) <br />and total combustible solids as required parameters, yet they do <br />not appear in Exhibit 1. Please provide an explanation for these <br />apparent omissions. <br />9. Although not specifically required in the permit application, <br />the Division ,believes that hardness should be analyzed for the <br />surface water sites. Without hardness values, comparisons to <br />table value standards would not be possible in the future should <br />they be developed for this segment of the Yampa River. <br />EXHIBIT 4- GROUNDWATER WELLS, MINESITE <br />10. Please provide annotation that distinguishes between field <br />conductivity and lab conductivity. <br />EXHIBIT 5- SPRING AND SEEP MONITORING <br />11. The tables showing the field data for springs RSP3 and RSP6 <br />have been cut off. Please provide these two tables. <br />12. The tables showing the field data for springs RSP2 and RSPS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.