My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP42793
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP42793
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:44:46 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 9:43:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
11/30/1995
Doc Name
1994 ANNUAL RECLAMATION AND HYDROLOGY REPORT HAYDEN GULCH MINE PN C-80-003 HAYDEN GULCH TERMINAL
From
DMG
To
TERRAMATRIX
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1II <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Dcparlmem of Natural Resuwces <br />1 31 .I Sherman 51 . Kuom ? I S <br />Denver, Colorado (41120'4 <br />I'honc 13031 R66 1R.: <br />FA\:131131 f1 P_-H 1116 <br />November 30, 1995 <br />I~~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />u~rv Numcr <br />r nn•~oi„ <br />Mr Michael R. Neumann nn~~.,c ~n,nn~•arl <br />TerraMatrix ~,;,I,,,~,,,, ~~„~ <br />P.O. Box 774018 u.,.~.,~~o~n•~~„~ <br />Steamboat Sprinqs, Co. 80477 <br />Re: 1994 Annual Reclamation Report and Annual Hydrology Report, <br />Hayden Gulch Mine, Permit No. C-80-003, Hayden Gulch Terminal <br />Dear Mr. Neumann: <br />The Division has reviewed the 1994 Annual Reclamation Report and <br />Annual Hydrology Report for the Hayden Gulch Mine and has the <br />following questions or comments: <br />ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT <br />1. Rule 2.04.13 requires the submittal of an annual reclamation <br />report that,~addresses specific topics for discussion. The 1994 <br />ARR does not appear to specifically provide discussion of those <br />topics. Please provide data that addresses Rules 2.04.13(1)(a) <br />through 2.04.•13(1)(f). <br />SECTION 2.0- HYDROLOGIC MONITORING <br />2. There are references made to well UC-2, on page 2 and in Exhibit, <br />4 of the 1994 ARR. However, Map 1 in Exhibit 8 shows the well as <br />being UC-1. Please reconcile this difference. <br />3. Examination of the surface water data for UHG-1 and LHG-1 <br />suggests that the effect of mining may have been to increase the <br />sulfate and TDS concentrations substantially. On average, the <br />sulfate concentration increased from about 233 mq/1 to 818 <br />mg/1 for the years 1987 through 1994. For those same years, the <br />TDS increased, on average, from 708 mg/1 to 1775 mg/1. <br />Although the water at UHG-1 already exceeds the suspect level <br />for domestic drinking water use, due to the high TDS, and is <br />marginal for sulfate, the apparent effect of mining may have <br />been to increase the difficulty for a homeowner, who uses an <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.