My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP42579
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP42579
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:44:29 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 9:39:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/1/1997
Doc Name
1996 AHR
Annual Report Year
1996
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 1.4 Groundwater Information <br />The data collected from the groundwater monitoring stations and laboratory results <br />aze presented in section 4. Well completion information is provided in section 6. <br />The sealing of all of the abandoned Somerset Mine portals precludes obtaining <br />underground water samples. Wells B-6 and H-10 aze used to monitor groundwater inflow <br />and quality in order to predict the extent of flooding in the underground workings since the <br />mine was closed in 1985. <br />H-10, a well in Hubbard Creek Canyon, was monitored in April and October for field <br />parameters. The full suite of groundwater parameters was analyzed in October. Results of the <br />analysis are included in section 4.1.1. After initially rising to approximately elevation 6028, <br />the water level in H-10 held steady for about two years from 1987 to 1989. Water levels then <br />rose again to approximately elevation 6068 in 1992. The water level has been in the range <br />from 6067 feet to 6069 feet for the past five years. <br />B-6, a well in Beaz Creek Canyon, was monitored in April and October for field <br />parameters. The full suite of groundwater parameters was analyzed in October. Results of the <br />analysis are included in section 4.2. ] . Patterns of water levels in B-6 are much different than <br />in H-10. After initially rising to elevation 6035, the water level fell back to elevation 6014 in <br />1990. Water levels then recovered, with a shght dip at elevation 6033 in 1992, to rise to <br />elevation 6051 in 1993. The water level has been in the range from 6038 feet to 6048 feet in <br />• 1994 and 1995, and the water level rose to 6051 feet again in 1996. <br />The Sanborn Creek Mine drill hole monitoring points SC-1 and SC-2 are designed to <br />monitor the water level and quality of the water in the Rollins Sandstone which is 40 to 50 <br />feet below the B-Seam. SMC collected one year's monitoring data during 1991 before any <br />substantial mining was performed in the B-Seam for the Sanborn Creek Mine. <br />Monitoring of SC-1 and SC-2 after mining is performed in the B-Seam should confirm <br />that the mining operation does not adversely affect the aquifer in the Rollins Sandstone. The <br />Rollins Sandstone is a confined aquifer as evidenced by recent water level measurements, <br />which are well above the top of the sandstone member. Water quality is poor, with high total <br />dissolved solids as sodium chloride. Inflow and recovery of the water level in the drill holes <br />indicates very low permeability and porosity of the sandstone. A significant drop in the water <br />level in SC-1 or SC-2 would indicate that the mine may be having an impact on the Rollins <br />Sandstone. Although there has been some variability in the water levels, there does not <br />appear to be a trend either up or down. <br />Drill hole monitoring point SC-3 is designed to monitor the water level and quality of <br />water in the water bearing zone in the D-Seam. This water bearing zone is some 200-feet <br />above the coal seams to be mined. A significant drop in the water level in SC-3 would <br />indicate that the mine may be having an impact on this zone. Although there has been some <br />variability in the water levels, there does not appear to be a trend either up or down. <br />SC-1, SC-2, and SC-3 were monitored quarterly in March, June, September, and <br />December for field parameters. The full suite of groundwater parameters was analyzed in <br />• June and December.. Results of the analysis are included in section 4.3.1, 4.4.1, and 4.5.1. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.