Laserfiche WebLink
1987 PRODUCTION AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS Page -2- <br />• Anomalous conditions: The strata was burned, oxydized, and weathered in <br />the 1 Left portal area. <br />South III Submains <br />Mined length: Submain type development was advanced relatively north for <br />approximately 4,000 ft. <br />Overburden thickness: 450 - 650 ft. <br />Mining height: B.0 - 9.5 ft. <br />Roof: The initial development encountered roof the same as in the First <br />West Submains. These conditions changed including an increase in <br />fractures, slickenslides, differential compaction zones and some <br />separations due to sag. The siltstone material was increasingly <br />appearing as mud stone, much softer and subsequently less compe- <br />tent. Various roof falls were experienced as the development pro- <br />ceeded. Minor water seepage in conjunction with the less compe- <br />tent roof material led to these roof falls. These conditions be- <br />came so dominate that economical mining could not be achieved. <br />The area was abandoned and development of the Second West Submains <br />. commenced. <br />Ribs: Little rib sloughage was encountered. <br />Floor: Same floor as the First West Submains. The interburden varied <br />from 12 - 18 inches thick. <br />Anomalous conditions: The roof falls experienced were a major problem. <br />The major falls consisted of thicknesses up to 8 <br />ft. Falls of 2 - 4 ft. were n~nnerous. <br />Second West Submains <br />Mined length: Submain type development was advanced east for approxi- <br />mately 4,500 ft. <br />Overburden thickness: 200 - 700 ft. <br />Mining height: 9 - 11 ft. <br />Roof: Roof material remained similar to the First West Submains with a <br />minor increase in mud stones, fractures, and slickenslides. Roof <br />falls were experienced sporadically, consisting of thicknesses of <br />• 1 - 3 ft. Two major falls, 6 - 8 ft, thick, were also experi- <br />enced. However, development was not significantly altered. As a <br />solution [o prevent hindering roof conditions, 3 - 4 ft. of top <br />coal was left for additional support. This was possible since the <br />"D" seam interburden diminished entirely. The top coal worked <br />well. <br />