Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Boulay <br />1995 AHR Responses <br />Page 3 <br />13. Please find a revised Page 15 enclosed. <br />14. Please find a revised hydrograph for well JMB-12 enclosed. Elevation values for the 1994 <br />AHR had been plotted incorrectly. This corrects the elevation discrepancy. <br />15. •A change in equipment provided direct specific conductance values, by-passing the <br />requirement to measure conductivity and convert to specific conductance. Specific <br />conductance, conductivity at 25°C, was specified in-Geu-of conductivity by TR71 [reflects <br />Rules 2.04.7(1)(a) and (v)(A), and 2.04.7(2)(b)(i)(A)]. <br />.Please find a revised Table E-14 enclosed. Flow was negligible. <br />.Please find a revised Table E-15 enclosed that includes water quality analyses for Wilcox <br />Reservoir No. 1. <br />•No record of sampling or testing of Wilcox Reservov [(6) (former G-38, decreed Spring <br />#14)] other than as reported was found. A revised table has been provided to correct the <br />decreed spring number. <br />.Please find a revised Page 16 enclosed. Flows from spring G-20 were too low to collect a <br />sample. <br />16. .Please find a revised Table G-1 enclosed. Analytical results of testing a sample from GP-la <br />on 9/15/95 have been added. <br />.Please find a revised Table G-5 enclosed. Analytical results of testing a sample from GB-1 on <br />9/15/95 have been added. <br />.Please find a revised Table G-12 enclosed. Analytical results of testing a sample from SW-3 <br />on 9/14/95 have been added. <br />17. Please find a revised Table G-1 enclosed. GP-1 and GP-la are synonymous and GP-la will be <br />used for consistency from now on. <br />18. Laboratory data sheets on file do not include analysis results for the missing parameters in <br />Appendix D for the North Fork Upper and Lower stations. The laboratory explained that field <br />measurements of pH and specific wnductance were considered more accurate, so lab analysis <br />was not typically conducted, but are now routinely included. <br />19. Please find a revised Table D-8 enclosed for the North Fork Upper station. Flow is not <br />measured at the North Fork Lower station. Seethe discussion under responses 4 and 5, above. <br />