My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP41946
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP41946
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:43:46 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 9:09:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/17/2007
Doc Name
2005 Annual Hydrology Report to Section 8.0
From
Hydro Geo Inc
To
DRMs
Annual Report Year
2005
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Final West Elk Mine 2005 Annual Hydrology Report 36 <br />• area took place from July 1998 to February 200E Longwall mining in the Deep Creek drainage <br />began in March 2001. Based on the water quality and flow monitoring data from WY 2005 (see <br />Appendices A, B, and C), there have been no apparent mining induced impacts to the water quality <br />or quantity of these streams with the exception of Sylvester Gulch. The water sampled at the <br />Middle and Lower Sylvester Gulch monitoring stations in WY 2005 consisted ahnost entirely of <br />the permitted mine water releases. Therefore, the analyses at these locations show considerable <br />mining-related increases in measured constituent levels and flows when compared with baseline <br />data. <br />It is important to note that in WY 2005 as well as in previous years (WY 2001 - 2004), the flow <br />data from the Upper and Lower Deep Creek (Appendix A) stations are suspect, due to channel <br />variations channel variations and the lack of flumes. <br />5.1.2 Impacts to the North Fork of the Gunnison River <br />MCC discharges water (Figure 8) [o the North Fotk via sedimentation ponds (MB-1, MB-2R, and <br />MB-3, 4, and 5) and direct discharges to Sylvester Gulch (discharge points 017A and 018a). The <br />major cations and anions of the sedimentation pond discharge water are sodium and bicarbonate. <br />• The sediment pond discharge waters aze slightly alkaline with pH values ranging from 6.52 to 8.72, <br />and average TDS concentrations ranging from 300 mg/1 to 3,500 mg/1. The major cations and <br />anions of the Sylvester Gulch discharge water are also sodium and bicazbonate. The Sylvester <br />Gulch dischazge water is slightly alkaline with pH values ranging from 8.07 to 8.44 and average <br />TDS concentrations ranging from abort 2,942 to 3,145 mg/l. <br />A salinity (TDS) loading analysis of the MCC's WY 2005 discharges was completed relative to the <br />current North Fork Cumulative Hydrologic Impacts Analysis (CHIS) (CDMG, 2003). The CHIS <br />analysis was conducted to assess the potential cumulative hydrologic impacts of mining and other <br />activities in the North Fork Valley on the North Fork's water quality and flow. The CHIS analysis <br />determined that no significant hydrologic impacts were expected as a result of mining activities. <br />The CHIS assumed that MCC's contribution to the North Fork would be a maximum of 5,520 gpm <br />with a TDS concentration of 2,500 mg/l. The total WY 2005 discharge from the Project, as <br />reported from the CDPS reports was approximately 330 gpm (Table 9). Based on this value, the <br />flow-weighted maximum annual salinity (TDS) load from the Project was 2,107 tons. This <br />represents about 6.8 percent of the value used in the CHIS. A summary of the salinity loading <br />from the Project compazed to the CHIS study is shown on Table ] 1. <br />September 2006 HydroGeo, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.