Laserfiche WebLink
- - <br /> <br />Jeff Deckler - 2 - April 16, 1986 <br />4. Well CCAW-1 shows an excessively high TSS of 3,621 mg/1, as seen in <br />Well PAW-4. Therefore, the same questions relative to Well PAW-4 <br />should be applied to Well CCAW-1; especially, are these data for the <br />sampling date November 26, 1985 useful? Also Well CCAW-1 shows an <br />increase in TDS to 3,890 mg/1 on February 26, 1985, what is this due <br />to, this is a factor increase of 6 above average? <br />5. Well ACAW-1 indicates normal good water quality variations up to last <br />sampling date of August 26, 1985. Then all data reporting stops. A <br />footnote indicates that MLRD has issued a discontinuance until further <br />disturbance in the valley occurs based on Stipulation No. 14. Neither <br />the copy of the letter nor Stipulation No. 14 is included in the <br />hydrology report. For public record purposes these should be <br />included. The letter is dated September 4, 1985 and applies to all <br />wells fom September/October readings. <br />6. No unusual aberrations in water quality were noted for the spring and <br />seep survey for August 1985 sampling date. Further, other than the <br />aberrations noted in this list (Questions 1-5) no abnormal effects or <br />parameters in excess of standards for the ground water monitoring <br />program have been observed. <br />Monitoring Results - Surface Water <br />1. Site No. CCS-2 shows two periods of sampling that indicate a marked <br />decrease in water quality. The first period is February 26, 1985 on <br />which TDS increased to 1,440 mg/1 and iron was up to 1.04 mg/1. The <br />second period was on August 26, 1985 when TSS increased to 329 and iron <br />and manganese increased to 5.65 and 0.19 respectively. These increases <br />are above limits set for Secondary Drinking Water Standards. <br />2. Information missing consisted of the February sampling period for <br />Site No. PRS-2, no explanation was given. Site No. SCF-1 shows a <br />discontinuance of field parameter monitoring in November 1985 as per <br />revised Stipulation No. 14. Again, to repeat, no copy of the revised <br />Stipulation No, 14 or original Stipulation No. 14 is found in the <br />report. <br />srs <br />9281E <br />