My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP40968
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP40968
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:42:51 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 8:53:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
6/28/1995
Doc Name
1ST QUARTER POND AND REFUSE PILE INSPECTION REPORTS SOUTHFIELD MINE PN C-81-014
From
DMG
To
DAVID BERRY
Permit Index Doc Type
Waste Pile/Fill Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />June 28, 1995 Page 5 <br />Sediment Pond Inspection Reports <br />Requirements <br />* Rule 4.05.6(13) requires that the sediment ponds be inspected on <br />a quarterly basis for structural weakness, erosion, and other <br />hazardous condition. In addition, the report should include the <br />level of sediment in the pond. <br />Compliance and Adeouacy Ouestions <br />* The pond inspection reports are done on a quarterly basis as <br />required and general information about the pond is provided as <br />required. However, a specific level of sediment is not included in <br />the report; only general information regarding where sediment has <br />accumulated and a recommendation to clean the pond is included. I <br />assume that the pond designs specify a maximum sediment elevation. <br />While the general information provided in the report regarding <br />sediment in the pond is useful, the inspection report should <br />reference the maximum elevation identified in the pond design. <br />Question: In future pond inspection reports, EFCI should <br />identify the amount of sediment in the pond compared to the <br />maximum sediment elevation specified in the pond design. <br />Question: It appears that a majority of the time, the <br />engineer's recommendations regarding pond maintenance is <br />disregarded because the same recommendation appears in more <br />than one report. EFCI should comment. <br />This concludes my review of the quarterly pond and refuse pile <br />inspection reports. Please let me know if you need more <br />information or would like me to follow up this memo to you with a <br />letter to the operator. Please let me know if you have any <br />questions. <br />CEJ/014REP01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.