My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP40968
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP40968
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:42:51 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 8:53:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
6/28/1995
Doc Name
1ST QUARTER POND AND REFUSE PILE INSPECTION REPORTS SOUTHFIELD MINE PN C-81-014
From
DMG
To
DAVID BERRY
Permit Index Doc Type
Waste Pile/Fill Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
June 28, 1995 <br />Page 4 <br />quarter. There is no indication in the report that this test was <br />completed. EFCI has committed to doing two compaction tests at <br />random locations on each active fill bench. Considering the total <br />active area of the pile, I believe that two samples are inadequate. <br />However, I would defer to an engineer to determine how many density <br />tests were needed for that engineer to certify that the pile is a <br />stable construction. <br />Ouestion: Was a compaction test on the refuse pile completed <br />during the first quarter 1995, as committed to in Appendix B, <br />Compaction Testing Program, of Exhibit 18? If so, please <br />provide an addendum to the quarterly report which indicates <br />this test was completed and the results of the test. <br />Ouestion: EFCI should revise the Compaction Testing Program <br />to commit to performing compaction testing each time a lift is <br />completed and to the submittal of the test results to the <br />Division on a quarterly basis. <br />Ouestion: EFCI should provide verification that two <br />compaction tests on an active bench is adequate to determine <br />the stability of the refuse pile. <br />/* From review of the violation that was written regarding the pile <br />construction and subsequent correspondence to abate the violation, <br />which now appears in Exhibit 18, I assumed that the question of the <br />stability of the pile at a 1:1 coarse to fine refuse material and <br />the plasticity values of the material had been answered. However, <br />in the current quarterly report and previous reports the engineer <br />performing the inspection recommends that, "Variation in the <br />characteristics of the coarse and fine refuse materials are to be <br />expected, depending on changes in the mine geology and mining <br />practices. The fine material should be sampled and tested to <br />identify an acceptable range of plasticity characteristics. When <br />high clay content material is encountered in the mining operations, <br />it should be sampled and compared with this range, with selective <br />placement of high plasticity materials in the pile to avoid adverse <br />stability impacts." This recommendation indicates that there is <br />still a question regarding placement of refuse material in the <br />pile, which further enforces the need to complete compaction tests <br />each time a lift is constructed. <br />Ouestion: EFCI should comment on Mr. Brent's recommendations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.