Laserfiche WebLink
Review of hydrographs and the above table shoos that floe the past five years has been <br />lower than previously measured. This is Largely due to relatively loner snowmelt runoff <br />during this period. Also affecting flow from the 004 pond is the reduced diameter of the <br />discharge culvert modified on May 29, 1987 (36 inches to 6 inches). <br />Review of Table 15 (Appendix A) shows the water at this site to be a Mgca-S04 type. TDS <br />has consistently increased since 1982 primarily due to a concurrent increase in upgradient <br />mined area and ground water resaturation in the spoils. Also responsible for the increase <br />in TDS in 1987 through 1991 is the tlecr ea sad spring snowmelt runoff for this period as <br />compared to 7984 through 1986. Reduced runoff antl subsequent evaporation during the <br />summer tends to concentrate dissolved solids, resulting in increased TDS over time. <br />Surface Water Site SN-S2-6. This site monitors Cow Camp Creek less than 1/4 mile <br />downstream of the NPDES 004 discharge and an adjacent diversion ditch. Review of a <br />hydrograph consisting of all data from May, 1981 to September, 1991 shows that spring <br />runoff has been lower than normal the last five years. Peak flows at this site have been <br />reduced further by the reduction of discharge culvert diameter in 1987 at the NPDES 004 <br />site discussed earlier. <br /> <br />Review of Table 17 (Appendix A) shows that Site b displays a MgCa-S04 type eater. TDS <br />values have increased every year (excepting 1991) as a result of the TDS increases noticed <br />at the NPDES 004 site (caused by spoils eater discharges) and, to a lessor extent, reduced <br />runoff and subsequent evaporation. <br />Surface eater Site SN•52-10. The site was instituted in May, 1987, and monitors Cow tamp <br />Creek at its confluence with Fish Creek. It is monitored May through September on a <br />monthly basis. As was suspected by PCC staff before initiating monitoring, this site <br />flows less often than the upper Cow Camp Creek, Site b. Flow was observed only for the <br />May and June monthly visits, while Site b floes year round. Flow at this site was 38 <br />percent less than that of Site b in May (80 percent less than in June) due to stream <br />channel infiltration and the absence of lateral inflow from tributaries to Cow Camp Creek. <br />water at this site is a MgCaN a-504 type (see Table 17, Appendix A). TDS increases <br />downstream due to the alkaline and saline nature of the soils along Lou Camp Creek in <br /> Twen[ymile Park, and due [o the evaporation in several stock reservoirs located on Cow <br /> Camp Creek between the two sites. TDS values at Site 10 fluctuate from year to year. <br />13 <br />