My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP39884
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP39884
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:27:59 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 8:33:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/1/1988
Doc Name
1987 Annual Hydrology Report - Mines 1, 2 & Eckman Park
Annual Report Year
1987
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I~ <br /> Water Quality <br /> <br /> Summaries of the water quality data for the eight Mine 1 ponds are presented <br />' on Tables 53 through 68 and on Figures 43 and 48 through 51. The field <br /> conductivity solids data shows some typical seasonal variation: the water <br /> quality improves during spring runoff. Ponds A, 8 (Station 63), D, F, and'H <br />' (Station 57) appear to be impacted by spoil spring inflows. The discharge <br /> rates from Ponds B and H are not significant during irrigation season and <br />' therefore these ponds do not cause any significant impacts. The mean <br /> irrigation season field conductivity for the ponds A, D and F are <br /> <br /> approximately 2800, 4000 and 35 0, espectively. These values are reflected <br /> in the dissolved solids concentr ion of Foidel Creek at station 8 which has <br /> <br />' / <br />a mean irrigation season dissolved solids level equal to Pond A. However <br />th <br />di <br />d <br />lid <br />f T <br />t C <br />l <br />l <br />l <br />k d <br />t <br />b <br />ff <br />d <br /> e <br />sso <br />ve <br />eve <br />oes not appear <br />so <br />s <br />o <br />rou <br />ree <br />o <br />e e <br />ecte <br />y. <br /> these Foidel Creek levels due to the much higher flow of Trout Creek. For <br />~ ' most of the ponds, no increased levels in any parameters were observed. For <br /> the ponds effected by spoil springs increased sulphates as well as dissolved <br />' solids were observed. Also slightly increased sodium and SAR were <br /> observed. For Pond F the dissolved manganese sometimes exceeded the NPDES <br /> standard. <br />' No discharges were recorded from the Mine 2 Ponds in 1987. Therefore no <br /> impacts to Fish Creek were observed. <br />Also of note, the water quality and flow rate of Station 87 and Spoil Spring <br />114 are almost equal. It appears that the high monitoring frequency of <br />' Station 114 is redundant. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />- 11 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.