My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP39607
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP39607
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:26:46 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 8:28:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/29/2004
Doc Name
2003 Revegetation Monitoring Report
From
SCC
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Reveg Monitoring Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
numbers rise. Sample sizes in Wadge Pasture sampling have been large enough over the years <br />• (usually 50) that observed means are thought to be fairly dependable. Assuming that the fifty <br />random points used in Wadge Pasture sampling in 2003 are a good representation of the <br />distribution of shrub growth, about ten percent of the area is likely to meet the existing shrub <br />standard of 900 stems /ac (1000 x 0.9). <br />In the PECOCO Pasture, the small sample size that has typically been used (10) is likely related <br />to the apparent fluctuations (chance sample placement "hitting" shrub patches some years and <br />not other years). <br />Species Diversity and Composition <br />Relative cover by lifeform (Table 24) is depicted for the various sampled areas in Figure 5. As <br />can be seen, the heavy dominance of woody species that characterizes the reference areas, <br />especially the Mountain Brush reference area is not matched in the reclaimed areas. In the older <br />sites at PECOCO and Wadge Pastures introduced perennial grasses (intermediate wheatgrass <br />and smooth brome) have asserted overwhelming dominance. Younger reclamation sites were <br />sown with native seed mixes and show more even balance between lifeforms. The uninvited <br />presence of introduced perennial grasses is unexplained. <br />• Species density reflects the total number of species present (richness) in 100 square meters one <br />meter to either side of the 50m cover sample transects. Species density data are summarized in <br />Table 23 and graphically presented in Figure 4. As can be seen there, a balanced presence of <br />species exists in the reclaimed areas that is not reflected in the relative cover data. The 1996 <br />and 1998-99 reclamation areas closely approached or exceeded the total species density of the <br />three reference areas. Were it not for the aggressive presence of the introduced perennial <br />grasses and fortis, it is likely that the species density in the PECOCO and Wadge pastures would <br />equal that of the reference areas. Of course, without those aggressive and productive species, <br />production would certainly be less. However, that parameter so greatly exceeds the standard set <br />by the reference areas that it would hardly matter from a bond release point of view. <br />Species density data observed since 1988 at the Seneca II Mine are compiled in the table below: <br />• 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.