My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP39426
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP39426
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:25:58 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 8:23:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1974004
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/29/2005
Doc Name
2005 Annual Report of Geologic Mapping
From
Lafarge North America
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />6.0 Analysis of Structural Discontinuities <br />' The stability of the rock mass that forms the highwalls of the quarry is controlled <br />by they discontinuities that exist within the rock mass. When the discontinuities <br />' intersect, wedges and blocks of various sizes develop and create the surfaces <br />along which sliding can occur. As observed throughout the quarry, the <br />' discontinuities all have a range of dip and dip direction, and therefore it is <br />possible that discontinuity orientations in a specific location of the quarry deviate <br />' from the general discontinuiiy orientations assumed for this report. <br />' 6.1 Evaluation of Discontinuity Measurements <br />' As the database for discontinuity measurements has increased, various methods <br />have been utilized to efficiently analyze the new geologic data relative to the <br />' existing data. The analysis of the discontinuity data was conducted using Dips <br />(Roascience, 2002), which is an interactive program for the analysis of <br />' discontinuity orientatations based on geological data inputs. For this study, the <br />data were evaluated with stereographic plots using a combination of contour <br />analyses and cluster analyses to determine representative dip directions and dip <br />angles for the predominant discontinuities. The contour analysis of the entire <br />' dataset (i.e., 2,863 points) resulted in a plot of density contours, which facilitated <br />deterrnination of the general discontinuity orientations (Figure 6). The cluster <br />' analysis further refined the data by utilizing an iterative approach to group the <br />data measurements into representative clusters. The nucleus of each cluster <br />represents the concentration center for the data (Figure 7). The differences <br />between each of the individual yew's analyses can best be seen on a <br />' stereographic presentation showing each of the concentration poles for the <br />clusters for multiple years analyses (Figure 8). A combination of the clusters <br />' from Figure 8 and the results of the contour and cluster analysis of the entire <br />dataset (Figure 7j were used to define the discontinuities and their orientations <br />' for use in this year's analysis. These poles are summarized in Figure 9 and are <br />presented in further detail in Table 2 below. <br />-15- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.