Laserfiche WebLink
Table 3 - 1985 No. 5 Mine Inflow Results <br />Sampling <br />Station <br />Flow (gpm) <br />1 <br />2 <br />2a <br />2b <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />1.4 Recent Study <br />8.1 <br />49.7 <br />.1 <br />.4 <br />15.2 <br />345.7 <br />8.1 <br />Not measurable <br />.2 <br />16.5 <br />.9 <br />see note <br />24.5 <br />~"2.2~ <br />TOTAL 63~ 0.7~ ~-~~ <br />~i ~~' <br />? 3' <br />On June 19th, 1986, a complete inflow survey was made in the Eagle No. 5 <br />Mine. Map IV-11, which is attached, has been modified to show the present <br />sampling points and moisture conditions in the mine. Also, Map IV-11 has <br />been updated to show the extent of mining since the last study. The way <br />in which water is handled in the mine is similar to the manner presented <br />in the prior study, i.e. gravity flow in western parts of the mine and <br />gravity flow augumented by pumping in the eastern parts of the mine. The <br />existing sumps continue to be used, which makes it impossible to obtain <br />readings from the exact locations presented in the prior study. Those <br />sumps are in the northern and eastern portions of the mine. For example, <br />the northern sump, which is the main mine sump, has flooded approximately <br />85 acres, which automatically eliminates this and the adjacent area from <br />the study. <br />The survey was conducted by traveling along all of the accessible main <br />entries and noting the presence of measurable flows of water. Where <br />submains intersected the mains, the flows from the submains were isolated <br />and noted on the map. If the flow was substantial, it was traced to its <br />source unless safety prohibited. As in prior years, t:he largest single <br />source of water to the No. 5 Mine is from the first trio of three normal <br />faults encountered in the second west section of the mine. These faults, <br />plus flow from the west, are prcducing approximately 391 gpm. <br />-3- <br />