Laserfiche WebLink
J.J. Dudash 2 February 7, 2005 <br />2. Table 1 on page TI-1 of the report states that quarterly laboratory parameters <br />are to be taken for well MW-2. However, the approved hydrologic monitoring <br />plan for MW-2, stated on page 2.05-41 of Volume 7 of the permit application, <br />shows that no laboratory parameters need to be taken. Please revise Table 1 <br />accordingly in future AHRs. <br />BRL -Error noted and will be revised for future AHRs. <br />3. Figure No. 33 for spring 50710 shows a field temperature of 606. Please revise <br />accordingly. <br />BRL -Figure No. 33 for spring S0710 was revised to show the correct field <br />temperature to be 6.6. Enclosed is a copy of revised Figure No. 33. <br />If you have any questions, please contact me. <br />Sincerely,~~ <br />~~»~ "~_ <br />J. E. Stover, P.E. <br />Consulting Engineer <br />Enclosures <br />cc: U. S. Forest Service <br />Bureau of Land Management <br />