Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />1 hearing. I've been in communication with him. <br />Z The firsC of the pages that you have is my <br />3 letter that summarized the Board's actions previously; the <br />4 next is the correspondence from him to me concerning this <br />5 hearing with an attachment to his contractor that he was <br />6 making arrangements with. <br />7 I'd like to give a real brief history to <br />g bring the Board back up to date again. This was a proposed <br />9 cyanide heap leach, two and a half miles north-northwest of <br />10 Idaho Springs. It was never permitted because bond on the <br />11 operation was never received; however, the Board did approve <br />12 the permit. <br />13 The Board found a violation, revoked their <br />14 permit approval, and recommended corrective actions that are <br />15 detailed in that first letter I gave you on July 23, 1980. <br />16 They deferred consideration of civil penalties until those <br />17 corrective actions were completed and had been inspected. <br />18 On Junc 2, 1981, Jim Mc/lydle and Jay Lucas <br />19 inspected the site. Very quickly, I think I'll let Jim <br />20 mention what he found there rather than me. <br />21 MR. McnRDLE: Well, the site has remained <br />22 unchanged, essentially, from the time that. the violations <br />23 were first noticed until we inspected tiie site. Nothing <br />24 was done on the site other than the removal of their <br />25 equipment. <br />Mir" vu•r err e.~ i~v,rr urn n< <br />r, niPnl lle.n hwi•l lr.p...,, ,. <br />l vm rro-,.~, dr. r...,J <br />l nrl. ~. , r.. r. ...l .,n 'l <br />