My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP38083
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP38083
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:17:38 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 7:58:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/3/1992
Doc Name
1991 REVEGETATION MONITORING REPORT
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Effects of Grazing in the Wadce Pasture Unil <br />As of the 1991 sampling, it had been tour years since grazing began in the Wadge Pasture. As <br />mentioned in the 1990 Revegetation Monitoring Report, there had been a decline in cover and <br />production over the entire study area including reference areas during the period of 1987 to 1989, <br />followed by a modest rebound in 1990. In 1991, cover rebounded further as it did in all reclaimed <br />areas, but whereas the overall reclaimed area cover increased by slightly over 5 percent cover, <br />the Wadge Pasture cover rose by slightly over 13 percent cover. Thus the trend of this grazed <br />., <br />area, as cited in earlier Seneca II Revegetation Monitoring Reports, to have cover values higher <br />than ungrazed areas, both in times of overall increase as well as in times of general decrease, <br />continues in 1991. <br />In 1991, as in 1990, production levels in the Wadge Pasture were higher than in any other <br />reclaimed area sampled at the Seneca II Mine, except the 1990 sampling of the 1986 Wadge Spring <br />area where an extreme development of alfalfa accompanied an extremely high level of production. <br />It is of interest that while cover rose by about 20 percent between 1990 and 1991, herbaceous <br />production increased by less than 5 percent. This trend was generally observable throughout the <br />reclamation, and might be explained by an expansion of perennial grasses by tillers and rhizomes <br />info areas left open from the drought. The above-ground shoots from such widespread tillers or <br />rhizomes are not likely to have much biomass initially, so relatively little effect would be shown in <br />production while ground cover increased more noticeably. Another (or an additional) possible <br />explanation suggested by the climatic data (see below) is that the relatively dry months of April <br />and May retarded the growth of grasses so that shoots from new tillers or rhizomes were still <br />relatively small by early July during the sampling period. <br />Whereas, speculation in the 1989 Revegetation Monitoring Report on the cause of the resilience of <br />the production (and cover) of the Wadge Pasture centered on the release of nutrients bound in <br />accumulated litter, the tact that the Wadge Pasture Comparison area (ungrazed) sampled in 1990 <br />compared so closely with the Wadge Pasture in cover and production cast doubt on the likelihood <br />that grazing effects had been so dramatic as earlier supposed. The extra-high cover in the Wadge <br />Pasture in 1991 compared to other reclaimed areas again raises the question of the cause of this <br />difference. Since the 'Wadge Pasture Comparison Area' sampled in 1990 and carefully <br />circumscribed to match the Wadge Pasture in every way except the presence of grazing, was not <br />sampled in 1991, rio direct proof of the effects of grazing in the above referenced cover increase <br />in Wadge Pasture is available. <br />r, <br />U <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.