My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP37154
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP37154
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:15:52 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 7:41:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/23/2002
Doc Name
2000 ARR and AHR, Compliance Review Memo
From
BYRON G WALKER
To
FILE C-81-019
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
231
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 23,2002 <br />• Page 4 of 4 Pages <br />The report is in compliance with this rule with the permitted exception that water quality data was <br />submitted by calendar year in-lieu-of water year (Permit, page 4.05-11). Water quality data is <br />required for surface flows at the New Upper Goodspring Creek, Lower Goodspring Creek, and <br />Lower Taylor Creek surface water monitoring sites. Water quality data is submitted in Discharge <br />Monitoring Reports (DMR) of the sedimentation ponds. This information is submitted to the <br />Division as copies of the DMRs at the same frequency as they are submitted to the Colorado <br />Department of Public Health and Environment (quarterly). They are included in the AHR by <br />reference. The Division reviews these reports upon receipt. Water quality data is also required for <br />the three monitoring wells (Gossazd, North Goodspring, and A6 Wells). <br />Rule 4.05.14(4)(c)(iii): If required by the Division, a written interpretation of the data and <br />identification of mining related impacts to the hydrologic balance. <br />The report is in compliance with this rule. The Division required no written interpretation of the <br />data, but summary statements are made in the report that data suggests there is no impact from <br />Colowyo mining operations on the quantity or quality of surface or groundwater. <br />The probably hydrologic impact (PHC) from mining activities [Permit, page 2.05-75; Rule 2.05.6(2)] <br />_ is that "Surface water will no[ be significantly impacted in the mine area". The PHC continues <br />(Permit, page 2.05-75) "In summary, the Colowyo Mine will not significantly affect the hydrologic <br />balance or water quality of the general area or the permit azea and [he affect to the hydrologic balance <br />within the permit area will be insignificant. Temporary increases in TDS and associated common <br />ions are expected to affect quality in backfilled spoils within the permit area." From information <br />available at this time, this review concludes that the impacts on water quality and quantity from <br />mining activities as the Colowyo Coal Mine are within the grobable hydrologic consequences as <br />perntted. <br />CC: Dan Hernandez <br />File:C:\W PDOCS\Colovryo\alirrvw00.doc <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.